R v Prager

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz
• Callis v Gunn

CONSIDERS

• Official Secrets Act 1911
• Official Secrets Act 1911 - Articles : S-9

APPLIES

• R v Priestley

REFERRED in

• R v Errol Clive Heibner
• R v Miller (A. R)
• R v Isequilla

[See more]

• Attorney General v Kelly, Ferguson, Behan, Kaye, Nelson and Holly
• R v Heaven (Vernon Washington)
• Gulam bin Notan Mohd Shariff Jamalddin and Another v Public Prosecutor
• Seow Choon Meng v Public Prosecutor
• R v Fulling

CONSIDERED in

• The Queen v Phillip Anthony Ella [FLR]
• R v Floyd David Willoughby and Others
• R v Floyd David Willoughby and Others

[See more]

• R v Floyd David Willoughby and Others
• Cavenna Ellis v HM the Queen
• The State v George
• The State v Peters et Al
• Prince et Al v The State
• Coronell et Al v R
• The State v Peters et Al
• Remy v R
• The State v Johnson
• Marshall v R
• Harvey v Tucker
• R v Smith
• R v Rose
• The State v Miguel
• The State v Pooran and Alleyne
• DPP v Pringle
• Rahming, Jr. et. al. v R
• The State v Peters et Al
• The State v Kanhai (A.K.A. ‘Doula’) and Jaggernath (A.K.A. ‘Jerry’)
• Coltes v The State
• T v R
• R v Bethel
• DPP v McNALLY
• The State v Smith and Moses
• Christopher Remy Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Bachan v The State
• R v Dean
• The State v Peters et Al
• R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)
• The State v Akeel Mitchell
• The State v Ali
• The State v Marksman
• Cavenna Ellis v HM the Queen

FOLLOWED in

• PP v Goh Kim Looi
• Hasibullah bin Mohd Ghazali v PP
• Juraimi Husin v PP

[See more]

• Dato' Mokhtar Hashim and Another v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Fung Yuk Shing
• R v Rowe

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 1 All ER 1114
• [1972] 136 JP 287
• 56 CrAppR 151

[See more]

• [1972] 1 All ER 1114
• [1972] 1 WLR 260

CITED in

• Attorney General v Foster
• Tofilau v The Queen
• Harris (Melanson) and Joseph (Marvin) v R

[See more]

• Cox (Michael) and Mitchell (Michael) v R
• Kirpaul Sookdeo and Others v The State
• The State v Colin Joseph de France
• Adams (Peter) and Archer (Michael) v The State
• The State v Oswald Gobin and Boniface Griffith
• Outerbridge v Grant (Police Sergeant) 1997 Appellate Jur. No. 14
• DPP v Howard
• Eversley Thompson Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• The State v Joseph Senhouse
• Melanson Harris Marvin Joseph Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

DOUBTED in

• Peart v The Queen

This document cites

• R v Priestley
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz
• Callis v Gunn
• Official Secrets Act 1911