Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd
Linked as:
Extract
Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Customs and Excise Act 1952 - Articles : S-4
- Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 - Articles : S-33
- PURCHASE TAX REGULATIONS, 1945, Dated MAY 22, 1945, Made by the COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE UNDER PART V OF THE FINANCE (No. 2) ACT, 1940 (3 & 4 GEO. 6. C. 48).
REFERS TO
- Attorney General for Canada v Hallet & Carey Ltd
- Bennett & White (Calgary) Ltd v Municipal District of Sugar City No. 5
[See more]
APPLIES
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
- Marsh (B.) (Wholesale) Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Chuan Keat Chan Ltd and Another v PP
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Marsh (B.) (Wholesale) Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- O’Reilly v The Commissioner of the State Bank of Victoria
- Derek Burford (Plaintiff v Martin Durkin (Inspector of Taxes) (Defendant
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
CITED in
- Dooney v Henry
- Menteri Sumber Manusia and Another v Association of Bank Officers, Peninsular Malaysia
- R Rights of Women v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
