Tofilau v The Queen

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
• Lam Chi-ming v The Queen
• Slatterie v Pooley

[See more]

• Practice Note (Judges' Rules)
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz
• The Queen v Matthew Joseph Marks
• R v Spencer and Another
• R v David Dunn
• Pearse v Pearse
• Pariente v Pennell and Another, Assignees of Judah De Pariente, a Bankrupt
• R v Richard Enoch and Mary Pulley
• The Queen v Malcolm Joseph Thomas Clarke
• R v Wilson (David); R v Marshall-Graham
• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• The King v Margaret Caroline Rudd
• Cornwell v R
• R v Richards
• R v Thomas Crockett
• Harrington v Caswell
• The Unitas
• R v David Birkett
• Em v R
• Maskell v Horner
• Central Bayside General Practice Association Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
• The Queen v Lorenzo Favata
• R v Francis Jones
• R v Christou ; R v Wright (Christopher)
• Myers v DPP
• R v Ollis
• R v Jarvis
• Callis v Gunn
• The Queen v Shane John Hill
• R v Yend and Haines
• Skeate against Beale
• R v Hannah Moore
• Wright v Wright
• R v Frangulis
• R v Middleton
• R v Court
• The Unitas
• R v Benjamin Scott
• R v James Powell
• R v Daniel Boucher
• The King v Jacob Thompson
• R v Looseley

REFERS TO

• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• R v Sleeman
• R v Cleary

[See more]

• DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
• R v Lee
• Cleland v R

CONSIDERS

• R v Swaffield;Pavic v R
• Mcdermott v R
• R v Warickshall

[See more]

• R v William Baldry
• R v William Row
• Sinclair v R
• Barton v Armstrong

CITES

• Mallard v R
• R v Drew
• R v Thompson

[See more]

• DPP v Ping Lin
• Ryan v R
• R v Voisin
• Ibrahim v R
• Deokinanan v The Queen
• Cornelius v R
• R v Kempley
• Bunning v Cross
• Foster v R
• R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex parte Smith
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz and Power
• R v Isequilla
• Wong Kam-ming v The Queen
• R v Priestley
• R v Prager
• Wendo v R
• R v Pritchard

COMMENTS

• Basto v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 231 CLR 396
• 238 ALR 650

CONSIDERED in

• R v Sullivan
• Weaven v The Queen
• Terry Mark Donai(Applicant) v Crown

[See more]

• The Queen v Russell Cotchilli
• Donai v R
• Roach v R
• Stuart v Kirkland-Veenstra
• Fleming v R
• R v Patricia Anne Gallagher
• Attorney-General for Nsw v Nationwide News Pty. Ltd and Another
• Ibrahimi v Commonwealth of Australia
• DPP v [Hoch (a pseudonym)]
• R v Rumsby (No 3)
• Police v Dunstall
• The Queen v Shivneel Shahil Kumar
• R v Cedric Simms
• Habib v Nationwide News Pty Ltd
• R v Mackie
• Raftland Pty Ltd as Trustee of the Raftland Trust v Commissioner of Taxation
• Thorne v Kennedy

CITED in

• Hogan v Riley
• Crown v Tony James Simmons
• Tony James Simmons v NSW Commissioner of Police

[See more]

• Crown Tony James Simmons v Kieran Moore
• Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission
• Em v The Queen

This document cites

• R. v. Rothman, (1981) 35 N.R. 485 (SCC)
• R. v. Oickle (R.F.), 2000 SCC 38
• R. v. Hebert, (1990) 110 N.R. 1 (SCC)
• R. v. Grandinetti (C.H.), (2005) 363 A.R. 1 (SCC)
• R. v. Collins, (1987) 74 N.R. 276 (SCC)



See all quotations

• R. v. O.N.E., [2001] 3 SCR 478
• R. v. Mentuck, 2001 SCC 76
• R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 SCR 449
• R. v. Broyles, [1991] 3 SCR 595
• R v Wilson (David); R v Marshall-Graham
• R v Richards
• The Queen v Shane John Hill
• The Queen v Matthew Joseph Marks
• Coventry v Charter Pacific Corporation Ltd
• DPP (on Behalf of HM) v Christie (Criminal Appeal)
• Toll (Fgct) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd
• Myers v DPP
• R v Prager
• R v Frangulis
• R v Middleton
• R v Looseley
• DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
• DPP v Ping Lin
• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• Em v R
• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• Cornwell v R
• The Queen v Malcolm Joseph Thomas Clarke
• The Queen v Lorenzo Favata
• Mallard v R
• R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz
• Rps v R
• Central Bayside General Practice Association Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
• Collins v R