Wilson v Wilson

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Jones v Maynard
• Rimmer v Rimmer
• Brown v Brown

[See more]

• Kelner v Kelner

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Wilson v Wilson

APPLIES

• Hine v Hine
• Cobb v Cobb

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-36

APPLIED in

• Re Johns' Assignment Trusts

REFERRED in

• Shinh v Shinh
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Bothe v Amos

[See more]

• Suttill v Graham
• Bernard v Josephs
• Smith (Astley) v Carmen Bailey-Smith
• Stephenson (Robert) v Anderson (Carmelita)
• Hunt (Onis) v Lenneth Hunt
• Pettitt v Pettitt

CONSIDERED in

• Cracknell v Cracknell
• Huntingford v Hobbs
• Maxime v Maxime

[See more]

• De Nobriga v De Nobriga
• Goberdhan v Goberdhan
• Clement v Clement
• Bedson v Bedson
• Sinclair Griffith v Orion Griffith
• Proverbs v Proverbs
• Proverbs v Proverbs
• Fay Veronica Wint-Smith v Donald Anthony Smith
• Augustus Jefferson Maxime Petitioner /Applicant v Lisa Mondesire Maxime Respondent
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).
• Harris v Harris

FOLLOWED in

• Leake (formerly Bruzzi) v Bruzzi
• Goodman v Gallant

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1963] 2 All ER 447
• [1963] 1 WLR 601

CITED in

• Proverbs v Proverbs
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Forrest v Forrest

[See more]

• Errol Cyril Denobriga Petitioner v Deborah Marilyn De Nobriga Respondent [ECSC]
• Stack v Dowden

This document cites

---

• Hine v Hine
• Cobb v Cobb
• Brown v Brown
• Jones v Maynard
• Rimmer v Rimmer



See all quotations

• Kelner v Kelner
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Married Women's Property Act 1882