Rimmer v Rimmer

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

REFERS TO

• Re Roger's Question
• Newgrosh v Newgrosh
• Re Dickens. Dickens v Hawksley

[See more]

• Jones v Maynard
• Hoddinott v Hoddinott

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1953] 1 QB 63
• 2 TLR 767
• [1952] 2 All ER 863

CONSIDERED in

• Gaymes v Gaymes
• Clarke v Clarke (Nee Gloster)
• Redhead v Redhead

[See more]

• Neptune v Taitt
• Abdool Hack v Rahieman
• Redhead v Redhead
• McKenzie (Marguerite) and Anthony McKenzie
• Samson v Samson
• Blackwood (Seymour) v Claudette Blackwood
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Abbott v Abbott
• Henry v Henry
• Pajotte v Babb
• Ferdinand v Ferdinand
• Austin and Another v Austin
• Thomas v Thomas
• Stevenson v Stevenson
• Jackson v Jackson
• Tyson v Tyson et Al
• Deveaux v Deveaux
• Walkine Nee Moree v Walkine
• Ivin v Blake (Property: Beneficial Interest)
• Young et Al v Bess
• Kathleen Akne Hopkins (Applicant Appellant) v Edward Oliver Hopkins (Respondent Respondent)
• Anthony Jeffery Loades-Carter (Petitioner Respondent) v Elizabeth Shirley Crichton Loades-Carter (Respondent Appellant)
• Christian v Yearwood
• Nicolitsa Togias v State of New South Wales
• Moody v Moody
• Hill v Hill
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).
• Ramsey v Ramsey
• Stoutt v Stoutt
• Devon Smith v Elizabeth Halley and Naureen John
• Harris v Harris
• Rahieman v Hack
• St. Ville v St. Ville
• Munia v Hariprashad
• Wilson v Wilson
• Layne v Layne; Dennie v Deshong
• George v Daisley et Al
• Stevenson v Stevenson
• Stoutt v Stoutt
• Davis v Davis
• Haynes v Berry
• Gouveia v Gouveia
• Wilson v Wilson
• Perera v Perera
• Hack v Rahieman
• Barclays Bank International Ltd v Mapp; Mapp Claimant
• Moss v Moss
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Griffith v Coward
• Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation
• Maharaj v Maharaj
• Oxley v Hiscock
• Moss v Moss
• Anne George Claimant v Bernard Louis Daisley Cibc Caribbean Ltd Defendants [ECSC]
• Paula Amanda Cameron Claimant v Christopher H. Cameron Defendant [ECSC]
• Davis v Davis
• Vulgina Alexander v Nollie Alexander Vulgina Alexander Claimant [ECSC]

DISTINGUISHED in

• Richards v Richards
• Re Bishop, deceased ; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Bishop
• Re Cohen, decd.; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Katz

[See more]

• Gage v King
• Tunstall v Tunstall
• MacDonald v MacDonald
• Diwell v Farnes
• Silver v Silver

CITED in

• Owen (Pauline Eunice) v Alvin Burnett and Harold Green (Executors of the estate of Erin Mills Rock Owen, deceased)
• Repatriation Commission v Tsourounakis
• Archer (Donna Marie) v Archer (Henrick Valentine)

[See more]

• Scholastica St. Ville Petitioner v Cyrus St. Ville Respondent [ECSC]
• Lau Siew Kim v Yeo Guan Chye Terence and Another
• Prestwidge (Warren Izette) v Prestwidge (Valarie St. Elaine)
• Haddad (Peter) v Arlene Beverley Haddad
• Eutetra Bromfield v Vincent Bromfield

REFERRED in

• Re Camkin's Questions
• Teau Ah Kau v Wong Kim Foong
• Wong Kam Fong Anne v Ang Ann Liang

[See more]

• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Button v Button
• Nixon v Nixon
• Re A Debtor, (No. 80 of 1957)
• Lau Siew Kim v Yeo Guan Chye Terence and Another
• Bedson v Bedson
• Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Stack v Dowden
• Carlson Dwayne McAthur Ferdinand Petitioner v Enid Joycelyn Ferdinand Respondent [ECSC]

FOLLOWED in

• Gray (Maud Lena) v Gray (Albert)
• Nagapushani v Nesaratnam and Another
• Marcia Alvina Davis Petitioner v Carl Winston Maxwell Davis Respondent [ECSC]

APPLIED in

• Chapman v Chapman
• Fribance v Fribance (No. 2)
• Cobb v Cobb

[See more]

• Gissing v Gissing
• Hine v Hine

This document cites

• Newgrosh v Newgrosh
• Hoddinott v Hoddinott
• Re Dickens. Dickens v Hawksley
• Jones v Maynard
• Re Roger's Question