Rimmer v Rimmer

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

REFERS TO

• Re Roger's Question
• Newgrosh v Newgrosh
• Re Dickens. Dickens v Hawksley

[See more]

• Jones v Maynard
• Hoddinott v Hoddinott

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1953] 1 QB 63
• 2 TLR 767
• [1952] 2 All ER 863

DISTINGUISHED in

• Richards v Richards
• Re Bishop, deceased ; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Bishop
• Re Cohen, decd.; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Katz

[See more]

• Tunstall v Tunstall
• MacDonald v MacDonald
• Diwell v Farnes
• Gage v King
• Silver v Silver

CONSIDERED in

• Samson v Samson
• Ivin v Blake (Property: Beneficial Interest)
• Kathleen Akne Hopkins (Applicant Appellant) v Edward Oliver Hopkins (Respondent Respondent)

[See more]

• Anthony Jeffery Loades-Carter (Petitioner Respondent) v Elizabeth Shirley Crichton Loades-Carter (Respondent Appellant)
• Nicolitsa Togias v State of New South Wales
• Davis v Davis
• Jackson v Jackson
• Layne v Layne; Dennie v Deshong
• Walkine Nee Moree v Walkine
• Abdool Hack v Rahieman
• Ferdinand v Ferdinand
• Redhead v Redhead
• Austin and Another v Austin
• Thomas v Thomas
• Stevenson v Stevenson
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Neptune v Taitt
• Henry v Henry
• Pajotte v Babb
• Young et Al v Bess
• Perera v Perera
• Wilson v Wilson
• Redhead v Redhead
• Moss v Moss
• Deveaux v Deveaux
• Gaymes v Gaymes
• Clarke v Clarke (Nee Gloster)
• McKenzie (Marguerite) and Anthony McKenzie
• Blackwood (Seymour) v Claudette Blackwood
• Stevenson v Stevenson
• Stoutt v Stoutt
• Munia v Hariprashad
• Stoutt v Stoutt
• Griffith v Coward
• Gouveia v Gouveia
• Ramsey v Ramsey
• Barclays Bank International Ltd v Mapp; Mapp Claimant
• Oxley v Hiscock
• Maharaj v Maharaj
• Devon Smith v Elizabeth Halley and Naureen John
• Vulgina Alexander v Nollie Alexander Vulgina Alexander Claimant [ECSC]
• Anne George Claimant v Bernard Louis Daisley Cibc Caribbean Ltd Defendants [ECSC]
• Christian v Yearwood
• Hack v Rahieman
• Rahieman v Hack
• Hill v Hill
• Abbott v Abbott
• Davis v Davis
• Tyson v Tyson et Al
• Haynes v Berry
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Wilson v Wilson
• Harris v Harris
• George v Daisley et Al
• St. Ville v St. Ville
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).
• Moss v Moss
• Moody v Moody
• Paula Amanda Cameron Claimant v Christopher H. Cameron Defendant [ECSC]
• Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation

REFERRED in

• Re Camkin's Questions
• Teau Ah Kau v Wong Kim Foong
• Wong Kam Fong Anne v Ang Ann Liang

[See more]

• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Button v Button
• Nixon v Nixon
• Re A Debtor, (No. 80 of 1957)
• Bedson v Bedson
• Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland
• Carlson Dwayne McAthur Ferdinand Petitioner v Enid Joycelyn Ferdinand Respondent [ECSC]
• Yeo Guan Chye Terence and another v Lau Siew Kim
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Stack v Dowden

CITED in

• Repatriation Commission v Tsourounakis
• Lau Siew Kim v Yeo Guan Chye Terence and Another
• Prestwidge (Warren Izette) v Prestwidge (Valarie St. Elaine)

[See more]

• Archer (Donna Marie) v Archer (Henrick Valentine)
• Haddad (Peter) v Arlene Beverley Haddad
• Owen (Pauline Eunice) v Alvin Burnett and Harold Green (Executors of the estate of Erin Mills Rock Owen, deceased)
• Eutetra Bromfield v Vincent Bromfield
• Scholastica St. Ville Petitioner v Cyrus St. Ville Respondent [ECSC]

APPLIED in

• Chapman v Chapman
• Fribance v Fribance (No. 2)
• Cobb v Cobb

[See more]

• Gissing v Gissing
• Hine v Hine

FOLLOWED in

• Nagapushani v Nesaratnam and Another
• Gray (Maud Lena) v Gray (Albert)
• Marcia Alvina Davis Petitioner v Carl Winston Maxwell Davis Respondent [ECSC]

This document cites

• Newgrosh v Newgrosh
• Hoddinott v Hoddinott
• Re Dickens. Dickens v Hawksley
• Jones v Maynard
• Re Roger's Question