Jackson v Jackson

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Bedson v Bedson
• Cobb v Cobb

REFERS TO

• Gurasz v Gurasz
• Bull v Bull
• Stewart v Stewart

[See more]

• Halden v Halden
• Gissing v Gissing
• Ellis v Ellis and Wilby
• Falconer v Falconer

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Jackson v Jackson

APPLIES

• Jones v Challenger
• Rawlings v Rawlings

AFFIRMS

• Jackson v Jackson

CONSIDERS

• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-30
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-36
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-38

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1971] 3 All ER 774
• [1971] 1 WLR 1539

REFERRED in

• Wight v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

CONSIDERED in

• Michael Victor Berry (Respondent) Eveline Ethel Berry (Appellant)
• The Law of Property Act, 1925 and Others (Applicant) (Respondent) The Bankrupt (First Respondent) (Respondent) Sally Barbara Elaine Holliday (Second Respondent) (Appellant)

CITED in

• Wiseman v Simpson

APPLIED in

• Williams (J. W.) v Williams (M. A.)

This document cites

---

• Gurasz v Gurasz
• Ellis v Ellis and Wilby
• Rawlings v Rawlings
• Halden v Halden
• Jones v Challenger



See all quotations

• Falconer v Falconer
• Bull v Bull
• Cobb v Cobb
• Bedson v Bedson
• Gissing v Gissing
• Jackson v Jackson
• Stewart v Stewart
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970