NG v KR (Pre-nuptial Contract)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Hyman v Hyman
• S. v S. (Matrimonial Proceedings: Appropriate Forum)

[See more]

• Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
• Sutton v Sutton
• N A v M O T
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Xydhias v Xydhias

REFERS TO

• Dart v Dart
• Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
• N v N (Divorce: Agreement not to Defend)

[See more]

• Peacock v Peacock
• Rowley v Rowley
• C v C (Ancillary Relief: Nuptial Settlement)
• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
• Beverley Anne Charman (Petitioner) v John Robert Charman
• Page v Page [1981]
• K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement)
• Marckx v Belgium
• JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom (44302/02)
• M v M (Prenuptial Agreement)
• F v F (Ancillary Relief: Substantial Assets)
• S v S (Divorce: Staying Proceedings)
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)

APPLIES

• Soulsbury v Soulsbury

CITES

• Hope v Hope
• John Wright Henniker Wilson v William Carr Foster, Nathan Wetherell and Mary Wright Henniker Wilson
• N v N (Jurisdiction: Pre-nuptial agreement)

CONSIDERS

• Otobo v Otobo
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-1
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-34
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-3
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : SCH-1
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Divorce Reform Act 1969
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-24
• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

DISTINGUISHES

• M v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

REFERRED in

• N v F
• TQ v TR
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino

[See more]

• MacLeod v MacLeod

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2008] 1 FLR 1478
• [2009] 1 Fam CR 35

CITED in

• TQ v TR
• Caroline Louise Hopkins v William Ian Hopkins
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino

CONSIDERED in

• Diane Lori Tabony v August Henry Tabony

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• White v White
• Otobo v Otobo
• JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom (44302/02)
• Beverley Anne Charman (Petitioner) v John Robert Charman



See all quotations

• C v C (Ancillary Relief: Nuptial Settlement)
• Soulsbury v Soulsbury
• Page v Page [1981]
• Hyman v Hyman
• Dart v Dart
• Crossley v Crossley
• John Wright Henniker Wilson v William Carr Foster, Nathan Wetherell and Mary Wright Henniker Wilson
• Peacock v Peacock
• N v N (Jurisdiction: Pre-nuptial agreement)
• K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement)
• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
• Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
• S. v S. (Matrimonial Proceedings: Appropriate Forum)
• John Wright Henniker Wilson, Esq., - Appellant; Mary Wright Henniker Wilson (the Appellant's Wife) and Others, - Respondents
• S v S (Divorce: Staying Proceedings)
• F v F (Ancillary Relief: Substantial Assets)
• Rowley v Rowley
• Hope v Hope
• N A v M O T
• Xydhias v Xydhias
• N v N (Divorce: Agreement not to Defend)
• Sutton v Sutton
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Rowley v Rowley
• M v M (Prenuptial Agreement)
• Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Children Act 1989
• Divorce Reform Act 1969
• Married Women's Property Act 1882