Arthur J S Hall & Company (Respondent/Plaintiff) v Melvyn Keith Simons

Core Citations

---

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1999] 1 FLR 536
• [1999] PNLR 374
• [18/12/1998] TLR 1

[See more]

• [1999] 2 Fam CR 193
• [1999] 3 WLR 873

REFERRED in

• Dale v Western Australia
• Newcastle upon Tyne City Council v Marsden
• West Wallasey Car Hire Ltd v Berkson & Berkson and Pugh

[See more]

• Barrie Tonner And Another V. Reiach And Hall
• Hoque and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• Xydhias v Xydhias
• O'Reilly v Lee
• Salahuddin Amin v Director General of the Security Service and Others
• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons
• Conlon v Simms

FOLLOWED in

• C.O.I. v Minister for Justice

CITED in

• Fennell v Leitch and Others
• Attorney-General v Chapman Sc
• National Westminster Bank Plc v Spectrum Plus Ltd and Others

[See more]

• D v East Berkshire Community NHS Trust and Another

CLARIFIED in

• Awoyomi v Radford and Another

DOUBTED in

• Jones v Kaney

CONSIDERED in

• Behan v McGinley

APPLIED in

• Kotonou v National Westminster Bank Plc

APPROVED in

• Janin Caribbean Construction Ltd Appellant v [1] Ernest Clarence Wilkinson [2] Wilkinson, Wilkinson & Wilkinson Respondents [ECSC]

AFFIRMED in

• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons

This document cites

---

• Barder v Caluori
• McFarlane v Wilkinson and Another ; Hegarty v E E Caledonia Ltd
• Boys v Chaplin
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Marrinan v Vibart



See all quotations

• Becker v Noel (Practice Note)
• Boys v Chaplin
• Harris v Manahan
• Smith v Linskills (A Firm)
• Walpole v Partridge & Wilson (A Firm)
• Kelley v Corston
• Rondel v Worsley
• Saif Ali v Sydney Mitchell & Company
• Rondel v Worsley
• Saif Ali v Sydney Mitchell & Company
• Hunter and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands
• Somasundaram v M. Julius Melchoir & Company
• Barder v Caluori
• Ashmore v British Coal Corporation
• Thwaite v Thwaite
• Davies v Presbyterian Church of Wales
• Dinch v Dinch
• Stephenson v Garnett
• Acton v Graham Pearce & Company (A Firm)
• Practice Direction (Financial Provision: Consent Order) (No. 2)
• Peacock v Peacock
• Phosphate Sewage Company v Molleson
• Atwell v Perry & Company and Another
• Practice Direction (Companies: Advertisement of Petition)
• Dickinson v Jones Alexander & Company
• Practice Direction (Family Division: Financial Statement)
• Peacock v Peacock
• Hunter and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands
• Dean v Dean
• T A Picot (C I) Ltd and Another v Michel and Others