Vastint Leeds B.v (a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands) v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant on Land and Buildings Comprising Part of a Development Site Known as the Former Tetley Brewery Site, Leeds

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Attorney General v Nottingham Corporation
• Graigola Merthyr Company v Swansea Corporation
• Salvin v North Brancepeth Coal Company

REFERS TO

• Bianca Cameron (Claimant/Appellant) v Naveed Hussain (First Defendant) Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd (Second Defendant/Respondent)
• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site

APPLIES

• London Borough of Islington v Margaret Elliott and Another (Respondents/Claimants)

CITES

• Sheffield City Council v Alice Fairhall, (2) Simon Crump, (3) Rebecca Hammond, (4) Alison Teal, (5) David Dillner, (6) Calvin Payne, (7) Paul Brooke, (8) Graham Turnbull, (9) Robin Ridley (10) Persons Unknown Being (i) Persons Entering any Safety Zone Erected Around a Tree and/or (ii) Deliberately Seeking to Prevent the Erection of or to Interfere Physically with or with the Use of any Safety Zone Around a Tree and/or (iii) Remaining within any Safety Zone After it is Erected and/or (iv) Knowingly Leaving any Vehicle in any Safety Zone or Intentionally Placing a Vehicle in a Position so as to Prevent the Erection of a Safety Zone and/or (v) Preventing Delaying or Slowing Down (for More than 20 Minutes in any 24 Hours (Whether Individually or as Part of any Group)) any Contractors (Engaged
• Proctor v Bayley

CONSIDERS

• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Hooper v Rogers
• Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd

[See more]

• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site
• (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-187B

CONSIDERED in

• RGCM Ltd v Adam Lockwood
• Chelmsford City Council v Leisure Parks Real Estate (Holdings) Ltd
• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown

[See more]

• St Albans City and District Council v Mr Anthony Hugh Taylerson
• National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown Causing the Blocking of, Endangering, or Preventing the Free Flow of Traffic on the M25 Motorway, A2, A20 and A2070 Trunk Roads and M2 and M20 Motorway, A1(M), A3, A12, A13, A21, A23, A30, A414 and A3113 Trunk Roads and the M1, M3, M4, M4 Spur, M11, M26, M23 and M40 Motorways for the Purpose of Protesting
• MBR Acres Ltd -v- Free the MBR Beagles
• The Honourable Ivor Edward Other Windsor-Clive, Earl of Plymouth v Jenkin Thomas Rees
• London Borough of Havering v William Stokes
• The Application for Interim Relief Under Section 11A of the Grand Court Act (2015 Revision) and Section 54 of the Arbtiration Act, 2012 Between (1) Leed Education Holding Ltd (2) National Education Holding Ltd (3) Hyde Education Holding Ltd Plaintiffs v Minsheng Vocational Education Company Ltd Defendant
• The Application for Interim Relief Under Section 11A of the Grand Court Act (2015 Revision) and Section 54 of the Arbtiration Act, 2012 Between (1) Leed Education Holding Ltd (2) National Education Holding Ltd (3) Hyde Education Holding Ltd Plaintiffs v Minsheng Vocational Education Company Ltd Defendant
• Frontera Resources Corporation v Mr Stephen Hope

CITED in

• Chelmsford City Council v Leisure Parks Real Estate (Holdings) Ltd
• Canon Medical Systems Ltd v The Imaging Centre Assets Ltd
• Canon Medical Systems Ltd v The Imaging Centre Assets Ltd

[See more]

• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
• Valero Energy Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• Transport for London v Persons Unknown

REFERRED in

• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown
• St Albans City and District Council v Mr Anthony Hugh Taylerson

[See more]

• National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown Causing the Blocking of, Endangering, or Preventing the Free Flow of Traffic on the M25 Motorway, A2, A20 and A2070 Trunk Roads and M2 and M20 Motorway, A1(M), A3, A12, A13, A21, A23, A30, A414 and A3113 Trunk Roads and the M1, M3, M4, M4 Spur, M11, M26, M23 and M40 Motorways for the Purpose of Protesting
• Lifestyle Equities C.v v. Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd
• Koninklijke Philips v Guangdong Oppo Mobile
• MBR Acres Ltd -v- Free the MBR Beagles
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• Tulip Trading Ltd (a Seychelles company) v Wladimir Van Der Laan
• Transport for London v Persons Unknown
• Shell UK v Persons Unknown
• Arla Foods Ltd v Persons Unknown Who are, without the Consent of the Claimants, Entering or Remaining on Land and in Buildings on Any of the Sites Listed in Schedule 2 of the Claim Form (“The Sites”), Those Being:
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another

APPLIED in

• National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2019] 4 WLR 2

This document cites

---

• Hooper v Rogers
• Bianca Cameron (Claimant/Appellant) v Naveed Hussain (First Defendant) Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd (Second Defendant/Respondent)
• Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site
• London Borough of Islington v Margaret Elliott and Another (Respondents/Claimants)



See all quotations

• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Proctor v Bayley
• Fletcher v Bealey
• Graigola Merthyr Company v Swansea Corporation
• Attorney General v Nottingham Corporation
• Salvin v North Brancepeth Coal Company
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
• Sheffield City Council v Alice Fairhall, (2) Simon Crump, (3) Rebecca Hammond, (4) Alison Teal, (5) David Dillner, (6) Calvin Payne, (7) Paul Brooke, (8) Graham Turnbull, (9) Robin Ridley (10) Persons Unknown Being (i) Persons Entering any Safety Zone Erected Around a Tree and/or (ii) Deliberately Seeking to Prevent the Erection of or to Interfere Physically with or with the Use of any Safety Zone Around a Tree and/or (iii) Remaining within any Safety Zone After it is Erected and/or (iv) Knowingly Leaving any Vehicle in any Safety Zone or Intentionally Placing a Vehicle in a Position so as to Prevent the Erection of a Safety Zone and/or (v) Preventing Delaying or Slowing Down (for More than 20 Minutes in any 24 Hours (Whether Individually or as Part of any Group)) any Contractors (Engaged