Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago

Afectaciones

CONSIDERA

• Army Act 1955
• South Africa Act 1909
• Deaton v The Attorney General and the Revenue Commissioners

[ver más]

• Director of Public Prosecutions v Mollison (No. 2)
• The Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom (Plaintiff v The Department of Health and Social Security (Defendant
• Army Act 1955
• Rent Act 1977
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Offences Against the Person Act 1861
• Rent Act 1977 - Artículos : SCH-1
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Artículos : S-3
• Attorney General of St. Christopher, Nevis and Anguilla v Reynolds
• Bennett v Chappell
• Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.
• B v Queen, The
• DPP v Nasralla
• Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd
• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• Maharaj v Attorney General for Trinidad and Tobago
• Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• De Freitas also called Michael Abdul Malik v Benny
• The Queen v Peter Hughes
• Fox v the Queen
• Pinder v The Queen
• R v Ireland
• Wakefield Corporation v Wakefield and District Light Railway Company
• Maharaj v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (No. 2)
• R v Ireland; R v Burstow
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health
• Hilaire v Trinidad and Tobago
• Hinds et Al v The Queen; and Director of Public Prosecutions v Jackson

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Roodal v The State

CITA

• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review
• Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.

[ver más]

• R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance)
• R v Ireland; R v Burstow
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• Wakefield Corporation v Wakefield and District Light Railway Company
• Berthill Fox v The Queen
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• Pine v Law Society
• Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago
• Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• R v Maharaj; and other appeals
• John (Jason) v The State
• Attorney General and Others v Joseph and Another

[ver más]

• Attorney-General v Ramdeen (Angela)
• Scantlebury (Mormon) v R
• Hunte and Khan v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)
• Francis and Another v State
• Naresh Boodram v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Dominic Suraj and 4 others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago

CONSIDERADA por

• The Queen v Alex Nousis
• Benjamin Ponteen (Lawful Attorney for Carolie Ponteen) v Montserrat Land Development Authority
• The Attorney General et Al v Joseph and Boyce

[ver más]

• Maharaj v Manning (Prime Minister and Head of Cabinet); Lai v Attorney General
• Henry et Al v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago et Al
• Chief Executive of Department of Labour v Yadegary and Another
• Momcilovic v The Queen
• Jason Jones v The Attorney General et Al
• Khan v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• The State v Nicholas
• Kirishma Beharry v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• The Attorney General et Al v Joseph and Boyce
• Lendore et Al v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Dottin, Teeluck, Jairam and Dial v Rougier (Commissioner of Prisons), Peterson (Registrar of the Supreme Court) and Attorney General
• Ramdeen v The State
• Josine Johnson and Another v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Jason Jones v The Attorney General and The Equal Opportunity Commission, The Trinidad and Tobago Council of Evangelical Churches, The Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha of Trinidad and Tobago
• Francis and Hinds v The State
• Ferguson v the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
• Minister of Planning and Sustainable Development v Joint Consultative Council for the Construction Industry
• Ian Seepersad and Roodal Panchoo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Cohen v The State
• Sylvester Spencer v Regino Nicholas
• Peters v The State
• Kingate Global Fund, Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Kingate Euro Ltd ((in Liquidation))
• Marcus Bisram v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• Jabari Sensimania Nervais v The Queen; Dwayne Omar Severin v The Queen
• Trotman et Al v Attorney General
• Griffith v The Queen
• Satyanand Maharaj
• Chantelleday v The Cayman Islands
• Between: (1) Crosby Collymore Ebanks (2) Wilson Jonathan Mendoza (3) Mario Alberto Gomez Petitioners v (1) The Governor of the Cayman Islands (2) The National Roads Authority (3) The Attorney General of the Cayman Islands Respondents
• John v The State
• Ferguson and Galbaransingh v Attorney General and Mc Nicholls (Chief Magistrate)
• Chaitlal v The Attorney General; Mohammed v The Attorney General
• Dominic Suraj v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Nigel Charles Marlon Hope v The State
• Naresh Boodram v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Police Service Commission, Commissioner of Police, Attorney General and Governor General

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• Trinidad and Tobago, The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Roodal v. The State [2003] UKPC 78 (20 November 2003); 16 BHRC 147; [2004] 2 WLR 652; [2005] 1 AC 328
• [2003] NR Uned 300
• TT 2003 PC 10

[ver más]

• 20/11/2003 Daily Cases
• [2004] 1 LRC 213
• (2003) 64 WIR 270
• [2003] 16 BHRC 147
• [26/11/2003] TLR 1
• [2004] 2 WLR 652
• [2005] 1 AC 328

SEGUIDA por

• Re Kingate Global Fund Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and re Kingate Euro Fund Ltd ((in Liquidation))

REFERIDA por

• Thomas v Commissioner of Police
• The Attorney General et Al v Joseph and Boyce
• Nimrod Miguel v The State

[ver más]

• Jay Chandler v The State

NO SEGUIDA por

• Boyce et Al v R
• Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago

Documentos citados

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Schachter v. Canada et al., (1992) 139 N.R. 1 (SCC)
• Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.
• R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance)
• Bennett v Chappell



Ver todas las citas

• R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health
• Pine v Law Society
• Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd
• R v Ireland; R v Burstow
• Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.
• The Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom (Plaintiff v The Department of Health and Social Security (Defendant
• Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security
• R v Ireland; R v Burstow
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago
• Wakefield Corporation v Wakefield and District Light Railway Company
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• B v Queen, The
• DPP v Nasralla
• Attorney General of St. Christopher, Nevis and Anguilla v Reynolds
• De Freitas also called Michael Abdul Malik v Benny
• Fox v the Queen
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Mollison (No. 2)
• Maharaj v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (No. 2)
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• Hinds et Al v The Queen; and Director of Public Prosecutions v Jackson
• Deaton v The Attorney General and the Revenue Commissioners
• Wakefield Corporation v Wakefield and District Light Railway Company
• Pinder v The Queen
• Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher
• Maharaj v Attorney General for Trinidad and Tobago
• R v Ireland
• Berthill Fox v The Queen