Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago
Linked as:
Extract
Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
- Army Act 1955
- South Africa Act 1909
- Deaton v The Attorney General and the Revenue Commissioners
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
CITES
- B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
- Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- The Queen v Alex Nousis
- Chief Executive of Department of Labour v Yadegary and Another
- Ramdeen v The State
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
- Trinidad and Tobago, The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Roodal v. The State [2003] UKPC 78 (20 November 2003); 16 BHRC 147; [2004] 2 WLR 652; [2005] 1 AC 328
- [2003] NR Uned 300
- TT 2003 PC 10
[See more]
CITED in
- Hunte and Khan v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)
- Attorney General and Others v Joseph and Another
- Scantlebury (Mormon) v R
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
REFERRED in
- Thomas v Commissioner of Police
- Jay Chandler v The State
- The Attorney General et Al v Joseph and Boyce
[See more]
NOT FOLLOWED in
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- Schachter v. Canada et al., (1992) 139 N.R. 1 (SCC)
- Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.
- R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance)
- Bennett v Chappell
