Ian Seepersad and Roodal Panchoo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
Linked as:
Extract
Ian Seepersad and Roodal Panchoo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- James v Attorney General
- Harrikissoon v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
- Boyce et Al v R
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- Children and Young Persons Act 1933
- Barbados Independence Order 1966
- Trinidad and Tobago (Constitution) Order in Council 1962
[See more]
REFERS TO
RESUELVE RECURSO
CITES
- Kemrajh Harrikissoon v Attorney-General
- B v Queen, The
- Inniss v Attorney General of Saint Christopher & Nevis (Saint Christopher & Nevis)
[See more]
CITED in
- Everton Welch v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda
- Anthony Henry and another v Attorney General of St Lucia
- Steve Ferguson v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
CONSIDERED in
- James Spencer v The Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda
- James Spencer v The Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda
- Andrew Thomas v R
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
This document cites
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey
- Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago
- Harrikissoon v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
- B v Queen, The
- Director of Public Prosecutions v Mollison (No. 2)
