B v Queen, The
Linked as:
Extract
B v Queen, The
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Deaton v The Attorney General and the Revenue Commissioners
- Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - Articles : S-53
- The State (O) v O'Brien
CITES
- Vasquez v The Queen
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey
- Vasquez v R; O'Neil v R
APPLIES
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- Mitchell Jacka v Australian Capital Territory
- Everton Welch v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda
- Crump v New South Wales
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Pollentine v Bleijie
- R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Griffith v The Queen
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
REFERRED in
- Boyce et Al v R
- Newton Spence Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
- Attorney General of Saint Lucia Appellant v Lorne D.C. Theophilus Respondent [Ecsc]
APPLIED in
This document cites
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey
- The State (O) v O'Brien
- Vasquez v R; O'Neil v R
- Hinds et Al v The Queen; and Director of Public Prosecutions v Jackson
- Vasquez v The Queen
