Griffith v The Queen

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Moses v The State
• Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago
• Boyce et Al v R

[See more]

• Director of Public Prosecutions v Mollison (No. 2)

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Griffith v The Queen

CONSIDERS

• Barbados Independence Order 1966
• R v Jarmain
• Bradshaw et Al v Attorney General et Al

[See more]

• B v Queen, The
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• Khan v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago

REVERSES

• Griffith v The Queen

CITES

• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey

APPLIES

CONSIDERED in

• Foster and Williams v The Queen
• Leonardo Forbes v The Crown
• The State v Akeel Mitchell

[See more]

• Scantlebury v R
• Attorney General v Carter and Austin
• Ian Seepersad and Roodal Panchoo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Re Griffith, Tennyson, Mark Harris et Al

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2005] 2 AC 235
• [2005] 2 WLR 581
• (2004) 65 WIR 50

[See more]

• BB 2004 PC 3

CITED in

• Trevor Anderson Foster and Another v The Queen
• Scantlebury (Mormon) v R
• Attin (Chuck) v The State

[See more]

• The Queen v Shonovia Thomas

This document cites

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey
• Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• Griffith v The Queen
• R v Jarmain



See all quotations

• B v Queen, The
• Bradshaw et Al v Attorney General et Al
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Mollison (No. 2)
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• Hinds et Al v The Queen; and Director of Public Prosecutions v Jackson
• Moses v The State
• Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Boyce et Al v R
• Khan v State of Trinidad and Tobago