R v Maharaj; and other appeals

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Indictable Offences Act 1848
• Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Articles : S-14
• R v Gee; R v Bibby; R v Dunscombe

[See more]

• R v Phillips; R v Quayle
• R v McKenna
• R v Tizard
• R v Assim
• R v Epping and Harlow Justices, ex parte Massaro
• R v Groom
• R v Watson
• Attorney General's Reference (No. 1 of 1990)
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• Defour v State
• Matthews v State
• Igwemma v Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
• Tiwari v State of Trinidad and Tobago

CITES

• Cadogan v R
• R v Epping and Harlow Justices, ex parte Massaro
• Matthews (Charles) v The State

[See more]

• Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court and Another
• Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• John (Marlon) v The State
• R v Rook
• Lobban v The Queen
• R v Makanjuola ; R v Easton
• Igwemma v Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
• Crosdale v The Queen
• Solomon (Winston) v The State

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (2002) 71 WIR 303

This document cites

• R v Assim
• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• R v Makanjuola ; R v Easton
• Igwemma v Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
• R v Groom



See all quotations

• Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court and Another
• R v Watson
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• R v McKenna
• Igwemma v Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
• R v Rook
• R v Tizard
• R v Epping and Harlow Justices, ex parte Massaro
• Crosdale v The Queen
• Lobban v The Queen
• R v Epping and Harlow Justices, ex parte Massaro
• Roodal v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• R v Gee; R v Bibby; R v Dunscombe
• Defour v State
• Matthews v State
• Solomon (Winston) v The State
• R v Phillips; R v Quayle
• Attorney General's Reference (No. 1 of 1990)
• Cadogan v R
• Matthews (Charles) v The State
• John (Marlon) v The State
• Tiwari v State of Trinidad and Tobago