Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)
Linked as:
Extract
Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
- Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-31
- Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-1
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- The London Borough of Ealing v AR (1st Respondent) JM (2nd Respondent) SD (3rd Respondent/Intervener) AM (A Child by her Guardian Julie Clements) (4th Respondent)
- West Sussex County Council v M (1st Respondent) S (2nd Respondent) W (Intervener) X & Y (children) (3rd &4th Respondents) L (5th Respondent)
- Re P and P (Care Proceedings: Appointment of Experts)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Re T (Care Proceedings: Appeal)
- Birmingham City Council v H and Others
- Kent County Council v The Mother
[See more]
REFERRED in
- A Local Authority v X (The Mother) (First Respondent) Y (by his Guardian, G) (Second Respondent) Z (the Father) (Third Respondent) P and Q (Foster Carers) (First and Second Interveners) U (Maternal Uncle) (Third Intervener)
- Re M (Adoption: Leave to oppose)
- Re I (Care Proceedings: Fresh Evidence)
[See more]
APPLIED in