West Sussex County Council v M (1st Respondent) S (2nd Respondent) W (Intervener) X & Y (children) (3rd &4th Respondents) L (5th Respondent)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof)
• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)
• R v Lucas (Ruth)

[See more]

• Re T (Children)
• North Yorkshire County Council v Sa
• Re T (Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)
• Re U (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B (A Child)

CITES

• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)

CONSIDERS

• R v Day (Jason Paul) (2010)
• Re R (A Child)
• Cambridgeshire County Council v PS and Others

[See more]

• R v Angela Cannings

CONSIDERS

• Children Act 1989
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-31
• The Family Procedure Rules 2010

This document cites

• Cambridgeshire County Council v PS and Others
• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• Re R (A Child)
• R v Day (Jason Paul) (2010)
• R v Angela Cannings



See all quotations

• North Yorkshire County Council v Sa
• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)
• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)
• Re U (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B (A Child)
• Golding v Crowle
• Re T (Children)
• Re T (Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Children Act 1989
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)
• Re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof)