Birmingham City Council v H and Others

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Lancashire County Council v B
• A County Council v K, D and L

[See more]

• Re U (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof); Re B
• Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan); Re W
• Re M and Mc (Care: Issues of Fact: Drawing of Orders)
• Re Uddin (A Child) (serious injury: standard of proof)
• Re U (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B (A Child)
• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)
• Re B (Children Act Proceedings) (Issue Estoppel)
• Re R (Care: Disclosure: Nature of Proceedings)
• Commins v The Mayor and Burgesses of Oakhampton

CONSIDERS

• Children Act 1989

CONSIDERED in

• M v L.A. (1st Respondent) F1. (2nd Respondent) F2 (3rd Respndent) C1 (4th Respondent) C2 (5th Repsondent)
• Re X (A Child)
• Re ZZ (Children) [FD]

[See more]

• ZZ, AZ, FA, ARA, KA and ASA (Children)
• Re C (A Child: Parental Order & Child Arrangements Order) v A

CITED in

• Re U (Children)
• Re Ad & Am (Fact-Finding hearing) (Application for re-hearing)
• Birmingham City Council v Mrs H [1] Mr H [2] S [3] (by her childrens guardian)

REFERRED in

• London Borough of Bexley v CW (mother) and Others
• Re N
• E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact)

APPLIED in

• A Mother v A Local Authority

This document cites

• Re Uddin (A Child) (serious injury: standard of proof)
• Re R (Care: Disclosure: Nature of Proceedings)
• Lancashire County Council v B
• Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan); Re W
• A County Council v K, D and L



See all quotations

• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)
• Re U (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B (A Child)
• Re B (Children Act Proceedings) (Issue Estoppel)
• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Re U (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof); Re B
• Re M and Mc (Care: Issues of Fact: Drawing of Orders)
• Commins v The Mayor and Burgesses of Oakhampton
• Children Act 1989