Stockport MBC (Applicant) AM (1st Respondent) Dt (2nd Respondent) L & K (Infants) (by their children's guardian) (3rd Respondent) SM, LS, T & E (by the Official Solicitor) (Interveners) Stockport MBC (Applicant) SM (1st Respondent) and and Another (2nd Respondent) and and Another (3rd Respondent)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof)
• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)
• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)

[See more]

• North Yorkshire County Council v Sa
• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• Re U (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B (A Child)
• Re R (A Child)
• Re T (Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• R v Day (Jason Paul) (2010)
• Gloucestershire County Council v Rh (1st Respondent) Ks (2nd Respondent) Js (by his Child's Guardian) (3rd Respondent)

CONSIDERS

• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-31
• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)
• Children Act 1989

[See more]

• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-1

APPLIES

• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)

FOLLOWS

• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)

CONSIDERS

• Re R (A Child)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2016] All ER D 03 Mar

This document cites

• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• Re R (A Child)
• R v Day (Jason Paul) (2010)
• North Yorkshire County Council v Sa
• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)



See all quotations

• Re A (Fact-Finding: Disputed Findings)
• Re U (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B (A Child)
• Gloucestershire County Council v Rh (1st Respondent) Ks (2nd Respondent) Js (by his Child's Guardian) (3rd Respondent)
• Re T (Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Children Act 1989
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)
• Re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof)