Re T (Care Proceedings: Appeal)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)
• Re D (Care Proceedings: Preliminary Hearing)
• Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - Articles : S-18

[See more]

• Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - Articles : S-20

CITES

• North Yorkshire County Council v Sa
• Piglowski v Piglowski
• Re G (A Child) (Care Order: Threshold Criteria)

[See more]

• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)
• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)

REFERS TO

• Re O and N (Children) (Non-Accidental Injury: Burden of Proof)
• Lancashire County Council v B

CONSIDERS

• Re G (Care Proceedings: Split Trials)
• Seaga v Harper
• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)

[See more]

• Lancashire County Council v B

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2010] 1 FLR 1325
• [2010] 112 BMLR 13
• [2009] All ER D 224

[See more]

• [2009] 3 Fam CR 631

REFERRED in

• Re J (Children) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [SC]

This document cites

• Re O and N (Children) (Non-Accidental Injury: Burden of Proof)
• Lancashire County Council v B
• Piglowski v Piglowski
• Re G (Care Proceedings: Split Trials)
• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)



See all quotations

• Re D (Care Proceedings: Preliminary Hearing)
• North Yorkshire County Council v Sa
• Re K (Non-Accidental Injuries: Perpetrator: New Evidence)
• Lancashire County Council v B
• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Re G (A Child) (Care Order: Threshold Criteria)
• NH v A County Council and Others; Re D (children) (non-accidental injury)
• Seaga v Harper
• Lancashire CC v A
• Offences Against the Person Act 1861
• Re O and N (Children) (Non-Accidental Injury: Burden of Proof)
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)