P.E.O. v S.E.O.

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)

CONSIDERS

• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991
• Child Abduction Act 1984

REFERS TO

• Puttick v Attorney General
• C. v C. (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Re N (Minors) (Abduction)

[See more]

• Re K (Abduction: Consent)
• A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• P v B (No 2) (Child Abduction: Delay)
• K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Cannon v Cannon
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 and T.K. and R.K. (children). A.K. v A.K
• R v R
• Re M (Abduction: Child's Objections)
• F.L v C.L
• M (A Child)
• ZD v KD
• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)
• C A v C A (otherwise C McC)
• Healy v Ulster Bank Ireland Ltd
• P (I) v P (T)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2017] 8 JIC 0401

REFERRED in

• Igbosono (A Minor) v Minister for Justice and Equality

This document cites

• Bielawski v. Lozinska, (1998) 56 O.T.C. 59 (GD)
• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 and T.K. and R.K. (children). A.K. v A.K
• R v R



See all quotations

• C. v C. (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• M (A Child)
• ZD v KD
• Healy v Ulster Bank Ireland Ltd
• P (I) v P (T)
• Cannon v Cannon
• F.L v C.L
• Re N (Minors) (Abduction)
• Puttick v Attorney General
• Re K (Abduction: Consent)
• Re M (Abduction: Child's Objections)
• K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• C A v C A (otherwise C McC)
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• P v B (No 2) (Child Abduction: Delay)
• A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)
• Child Abduction Act 1984
• Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000
• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991