P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Re HB (Abduction: Children's Objections)

RESUELVE RECURSO

• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)

CONSIDERS

• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991

DISTINGUISHES

• P v B (No 2) (Child Abduction: Delay)

REFERS TO

• Re N (Minors) (Abduction)

CITES

• Re K (Abduction: Child's Objections)

FOLLOWS

• Cannon v Cannon
• A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)
• K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)

[See more]

• Minister for Justice (E.M.) v J.M.

AFFIRMS

• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)

REFERRED in

• D (Z) v D (K)
• M.L. v J.C.
• AA v RR

[See more]

• K.W. v P.W.
• R.P v S.D
• ZD v KD
• Lincolnshire County Council v J.MCA
• C.D.G. v J.B.
• JJ v PJ
• P.E.O. v S.E.O.
• V.R v C.O'N.
• D.M. v V.K.
• B v C

CITED in

• B.F. v E.R
• A.M. v S.McG

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2008] 4 JIC 1101
• [2009] 1 IR 1

CONSIDERED in

• D.M. v V.K.
• G.D -v- J.F (Child Abduction: Grave Risk)
• C.M.W. v S.J.F.

[See more]

• W.W. v D.D. (Child Abduction: Habitual Residence, Exercise of Custody Rights, Grave Risk, Views of the Child)
• C.D.G. v J.B.
• F v C
• Q. v Q
• C.D.G v J.B
• S.S. v K.A.
• J.K -v- L.E (Child Abduction: Grave Risk, Views of the Child)
• Ugo v Fpo
• J.M. v B.M.
• Re A.B. (A Child)(Grave risk defence: domestic violence)
• S.O. v A.B.
• O.S. v O.S. (Child Abduction: Exercise of Custody Rights, Grave Risk, Separation of Siblings, Views of the Child)
• D.M. v V.K.
• S.H. v J.C.
• C. v G
• J.A.H.O. v M.R

APPLIED in

• Ugo v Fpo

This document cites

---

• Minister for Justice (E.M.) v J.M.
• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)
• Cannon v Cannon
• Re N (Minors) (Abduction)
• Re HB (Abduction: Children's Objections)



See all quotations

• Re K (Abduction: Child's Objections)
• K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• P v B (No 2) (Child Abduction: Delay)
• A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)
• Family Law Act, 1995
• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991