K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)

Core Citations

---

CITES

• Re H (Minors) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• C.K. v C.K.; Re P.K. and C.K.
• R.J. v M.R

[See more]

• Re G (A Minor) (Abduction)

REFERS TO

• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re A (A Minor) (Abduction)
• NK v JK (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)

[See more]

• Re L (Child Abduction) (Psychological Harm)
• Re S (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)

CONSIDERS

• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991
• Re AZ (A Minor) (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Re A (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)

[See more]

• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)

DISTINGUISHES

• PF v MF

FOLLOWS

• Hay v O'Grady
• P v B

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2003] Fam LJ 30
• [2003] Fam LJ 30
• [2000] 2 IR 416

CONSIDERED in

• N (C.) v D. (P. K.)
• Li (P) v La (E)
• KBC Bank Ireland Plc v BCM Hanby Wallace (A Firm)

[See more]

• Bu (A) v Be (J)
• C. T. v P. S
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 and T.K. and R.K. (children). A.K. v A.K
• R v R
• E.C. v J.F.
• D.M. v V.K.
• A.W. v O.U.
• Z.R v D.H.
• R.v v A.A.
• W.B. v S. McC. and Another
• S.O. v A.B.
• B.E. v R.E.
• N (M) v N (R)
• W. v W. (Child Abduction: Consent and Acquiescence, Evidence on Affidavit, Views of the Child)
• L.F. v S.C. (Child Abduction: Grave Risk, Views of the Child)
• M.I. v M.B.R
• U (A) v U (TN)
• K v E
• F.L v C.L
• A v B
• J.A.H.O. v M.R
• L.B. v A.H.
• C. v G. (Child Abduction (Poland) Grave Risk Defence)
• Ugo v Fpo
• J.M. v B.M.
• D.M. v V.K.
• W. v C
• J.K -v- L.E (Child Abduction: Grave Risk, Views of the Child)
• S.H. v J.C.
• B v C

CITED in

• D (Z) v D (K)
• P. M. P. v K. T. P
• B.F. v E.R

[See more]

• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 and an Application pursuant to Article 15 of the Hague Convention and JC A Child: RC v IS
• K(R) v G(I)
• R.R v J.Z.R
• A.P.P. v S.A.P.
• K. v E
• A v B
• P.N. v T.D.
• M.L. v J.C.
• R v R

REFERRED in

• R.P v S.D
• M.S.H. v L.H. (Child Abduction: custody)
• R.R v L.M.R

[See more]

• M.U. v N.R
• ZD v KD
• T (R) v M (S)
• M-K-D v K-W-D
• V.R v C.O'N.
• RP v LN
• P.F. v C.R
• K.W. v P.W.
• AA v RR
• C. v G
• JJ v PJ
• P.E.O. v S.E.O.
• Ugo v Fpo
• J.v v Q.I.
• K.W. v P.W.
• Minister for Justice (E.M.) v J.M.
• D.M. v V.K.
• S.S. v K.A.

FOLLOWED in

• S.R v M.M.R
• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)

APPLIED in

• V.G v P.McD
• C. v G

This document cites

---

• Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 SCR 551
• Re G (A Minor) (Abduction)
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Hay v O'Grady
• C. v C. (Abduction: Rights of Custody)



See all quotations

• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re A (A Minor) (Abduction)
• Re S (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Re A (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Re AZ (A Minor) (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• P v B
• P v P (Minors) (Child Abduction)
• PF v MF
• Re H (Minors) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re L (Child Abduction) (Psychological Harm)
• Orr v Ford
• W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• NK v JK (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• R.J. v M.R
• C.K. v C.K.; Re P.K. and C.K.
• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991