A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 - Articles : S-1
• G (R) v G (B)

DISTINGUISHES

• F (P) v F (M)

FOLLOWS

• P v B
• C.K. v C.K.; Re P.K. and C.K.

APPROVES

• W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Re A (A Minor) (Abduction)
• Re HB (Abduction: Children's Objections)

[See more]

• Re K (Abduction: Child's Objections)
• Re A (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)

REFERRED in

• W(E) v B(SA)
• D (Z) v D (K)
• MN v an

[See more]

• R.P v S.D
• TM v MD
• R.R v L.M.R
• M.U. v N.R
• A.Q. v P.Q.
• ZD v KD
• T (R) v M (S)
• M-K-D v K-W-D
• M.S. v A.R
• P.F. v C.R
• B v C
• I.F. v J.G.
• K.W. v P.W.
• C.M.W. v S.J.F.
• AA v RR
• JJ v PJ
• P.E.O. v S.E.O.
• Ugo v Fpo
• J.v v Q.I.
• M (TM) v D (M)
• Minister for Justice (E.M.) v J.M.
• C.D.G. v J.B.
• Lincolnshire County Council v J.MCA

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1998] 2 IR 244 (Digest)
• [1998] 2 IR 244

CITED in

• E.H v S.H (Child Abduction)
• H (E)v H (S)
• K(R) v G(I)

[See more]

• R.R v J.Z.R
• B.B. v Z.S.
• S.R v M.M.R
• A.P.P. v S.A.P.
• A (C) v A (C)(Orse McC (C))
• CT v PS
• K. v E
• M.L. v J.L.
• S.S. v K.A.
• M.L. v J.C.
• R v R
• B v C

APPLIED in

• C A v C A (otherwise C McC)
• Nottinghamshire County Council v K.B. and Another
• K.W. v P.W.

CONSIDERED in

• KBC Bank Ireland Plc v BCM Hanby Wallace (A Firm)
• D.M. v V.K.
• O.S. v O.S. (Child Abduction: Exercise of Custody Rights, Grave Risk, Separation of Siblings, Views of the Child)

[See more]

• W.W. v D.D. (Child Abduction: Habitual Residence, Exercise of Custody Rights, Grave Risk, Views of the Child)
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 and The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and Council Regulation 2201/2003 and I C (A Minor) between Z C v A G
• G.D -v- J.F (Child Abduction: Grave Risk)
• W.B. v S. McC. and Another
• S.O. v A.B.
• F v C
• MM v RR
• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)
• L.F. v S.C. (Child Abduction: Grave Risk, Views of the Child)
• M.I. v M.B.R
• C.D.G v J.B
• RP v LN
• C.D.G. v J.B.
• Re A.B. (A Child)(Grave risk defence: domestic violence)
• U (A) v U (TN)
• K v E
• Q. v Q
• J.A.H.O. v M.R
• E (D) v B (E)
• C. v G
• C. v G. (Child Abduction (Poland) Grave Risk Defence)
• J.T.S. v M.K.S.
• Ugo v Fpo
• J.M. v B.M.
• W. v C
• J.K -v- L.E (Child Abduction: Grave Risk, Views of the Child)
• S.H. v J.C.

COMMENTED in

• R v R

FOLLOWED in

• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)

This document cites

---

• Re A (A Minor) (Abduction)
• F (P) v F (M)
• Re A (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• G (R) v G (B)
• P v B



See all quotations

• Re HB (Abduction: Children's Objections)
• Re K (Abduction: Child's Objections)
• W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• C.K. v C.K.; Re P.K. and C.K.
• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991