Cannon v Cannon

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Perrin v Perrin

REFERS TO

• Perrin v Perrin; Powell v Powell
• Soucie v Soucie
• Re A (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)

[See more]

• P v B (No 2) (Child Abduction: Delay)

APPLIES

• Re N (Minors) (Abduction)

CONSIDERS

• Puttick v Attorney General
• Graziano v Daniels
• Director General, Department of Community Services v M

[See more]

• Townsend v Director General, Department of Families, Youth and Community
• C. v C. (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Re S (A Minor) (Abduction)
• State Central Authority v Ayob
• Re H (Abduction: Child of 16)
• Re M (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 - Articles : SCH-1
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Children Act 1989
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Children Act 1989

CONSIDERED in

• RA v RQ
• M v B
• C (A Child)

[See more]

• M v M and Others
• Re F (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Kent County Council v C, G and AG
• Re S, N and C (Non-Hague Convention Abduction: Habitual Residence: Child's Views)
• AX v CY
• Applicant parent v The Birth Mother
• M and another (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) Re
• Simpson v Hamilton
• ZD v KD
• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)
• Madonna Louise Ciccone v Guy Stuart Ritchie (First Respondent) Rocco John Ritchie (No 1) (Second Respondent)
• LC (Children)
• TV v ML
• M and another (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) Re
• P (A Child) (Abduction: Child's Objections)

CITED in

• G (A Child)
• D (Z) v D (K)
• Re S (A Child) (Habitual Residence and Child's Objections) (Brazil)

[See more]

• AH v CD

REFERRED in

• Re RD (Child Abduction)
• Re E (Abduction: Intolerable Situation)
• AX v CY

[See more]

• F v M & N (Abduction: Acquiescence: Settlement)
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 and T.K. and R.K. (children). A.K. v A.K
• J v C (First Respondent) B (Second Respondent)
• Re O (Children)
• Re S C (A Child)
• ES v LS
• MM v RR
• JJ v PJ
• P.E.O. v S.E.O.

FOLLOWED in

• P.L. v E.C. (Child abduction)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 19/10/2004 Daily Cases
• [2005] 1 FLR 169
• [2004] All ER D 252 Oct

[See more]

• [28/10/2004] TLR 1
• [2005] 1 WLR 32
• [2004] 3 Fam CR 438

This document cites

• Bielawski v. Lozinska, (1998) 56 O.T.C. 59 (GD)
• C. v C. (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Re S (A Minor) (Abduction)
• Re A (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Re N (Minors) (Abduction)



See all quotations

• Puttick v Attorney General
• Perrin v Perrin; Powell v Powell
• Re H (Abduction: Child of 16)
• Re M (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• State Central Authority v Ayob
• Graziano v Daniels
• P v B (No 2) (Child Abduction: Delay)
• Soucie v Soucie
• Director General, Department of Community Services v M
• Townsend v Director General, Department of Families, Youth and Community
• Perrin v Perrin
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• Children Act 1989
• Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000
• Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
• Human Rights Act 1998