Indyka v Indyka

Core Citations

---

DOUBTS

• Shaw v Gould

CONSIDERS

• Garthwaite v Garthwaite
• Niboyet v Niboyet
• Harvey v Farnie

[See more]

• Arnold v Arnold
• Lack v Lack
• Harvey v Farnie
• Re Wilson's Trusts; Shaw v Gould

CONSIDERS

• Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Act 1926
• Matrimonial Causes (Dominions Troops) Act 1919
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes (War Marriages) Act 1944
• Indian Divorces (Validity) Act 1921
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1857
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1949
• Employment Rights Act 1996
• Niboyet v Niboyet
• Armitage v Attorney General. Gillig v Gillig
• Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Scott
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1949 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 - Articles : S-13
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-40
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950 - Articles : S-18

REFERS TO

• Keyes v Keyes
• Herd v Herd
• Mountbatten v Mountbatten

[See more]

• Wall v Wall
• Gray (orse. Formosa) v Formosa
• R v William Martin Lolley
• Garthwaite v Garthwaite
• Ogden v Ogden
• Salvesen v Administrator of Austrian Property
• Lord v Colvin
• Stathatos v Stathatos
• De Montaigu v de Montaigu
• Levett v Levett & Smith
• Lepre v Lepre
• Attorney General for Alberta v Cook
• Bater v Bater
• Armytage v Armytage
• Fenton v Fenton
• Lord Advocate v Jaffrey
• Ross v Ellison or Ross
• Wilson v Wilson
• Bowie (or Ramsay) v Liverpool Royal Infirmary
• Schibsby v Westenholz
• Dunne v Saban
• Winans and Another v Attorney-General (on Behalf of HM)
• Harvey v Farnie

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Indyka v Indyka

APPLIES

• Travers v Holley

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1967] UKHL J0523-1
• [1967] 2 All ER 689
• [1967] 3 WLR 510

[See more]

• [1969] 1 AC 33

REFERRED in

• Angelo v Angelo
• Welsby v Welsby
• Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)

[See more]

• Tijanic v Tijanic
• Blair v Blair
• Hornett v Hornett
• Turczak v Turczak
• Mayfield v Mayfield
• Kunstler v Kunstler
• Ramesh a/l Rajaratnam v SL Sharlini a/p Marnickam
• Gurcharan Singh Karnal Singh v Mninder Kaur Piara Singh
• Siah Teong Woei v Janet Traynor
• M.E.C. v J.A.C. and J.O.C.
• Adams v Adams
• C v C

APPLIED in

• Angelo v Angelo
• Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)
• Blair v Blair

[See more]

• Brown v Brown
• Mayfield v Mayfield
• F v F

CONSIDERED in

• Davis v A. G
• Giannotti v Giannotti
• M.H. v G.H.

[See more]

• Harding v Harding
• Flightlease (Ireland) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
• Flightlease (Ireland) Ltd
• Clancy v Min Social Welfare
• Sinclair v Sinclair
• Westminster City Council v C and Others
• Akinnoye-Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje
• C(K) v C(M)
• Vyazemskaya v Safin,
• F v F and Another
• Nazia Parveen v Assim Balal Hussain
• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
• Almarzooqi v Salih

FOLLOWED in

• Mather v Mahoney

CITED in

• Bandone v Sol Properties
• Wheeler v Wheeler
• W v W

[See more]

• New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Grant; Rubin v Eurofinance SA

This document cites

---

• Levett v Levett & Smith
• Garthwaite v Garthwaite
• Winans and Another v Attorney-General (on Behalf of HM)
• Ross v Ellison or Ross
• Salvesen v Administrator of Austrian Property



See all quotations

• Bowie (or Ramsay) v Liverpool Royal Infirmary
• Gray (orse. Formosa) v Formosa
• Travers v Holley
• Lord Advocate v Jaffrey
• Fenton v Fenton
• Niboyet v Niboyet
• Attorney General for Alberta v Cook
• Bater v Bater
• Wilson v Wilson
• Lack v Lack
• Schibsby v Westenholz
• Lord v Colvin
• Lepre v Lepre
• Harvey v Farnie
• Keyes v Keyes
• Stathatos v Stathatos
• Harvey v Farnie
• Dunne v Saban
• Garthwaite v Garthwaite
• Arnold v Arnold
• Herd v Herd
• Armytage v Armytage
• Mountbatten v Mountbatten
• Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Scott
• Armitage v Attorney General. Gillig v Gillig
• Wall v Wall
• R v William Martin Lolley
• Niboyet v Niboyet
• De Montaigu v de Montaigu
• Shaw v Gould