Extract
Esso Petroleum Company, Ltd v Scott Breen
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
-
American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd
-
Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company v Veitch
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Total Network SL
[See more]
-
London Borough of Islington v Margaret Elliott and Another (Respondents/Claimants)
-
(1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nora Ziegler
-
Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
-
Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
-
Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
-
National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown deliberately causing the blocking, slowing down, obstructing or otherwise interfering with the flow of traffic onto or off or along the strategic road network for the purpose of protesting and Others
-
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Elliott Cuciurean
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others
-
Shell v Persons Unknown
-
Cream Holdings Ltd and Others v Banerjee and another
FOLLOWS
CONSIDERED in
This document cites
-
Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
-
Backman v. Minister of National Revenue, 2001 SCC 10
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nora Ziegler
-
American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd
-
Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company v Veitch
See all quotations
-
London Borough of Islington v Margaret Elliott and Another (Respondents/Claimants)
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Total Network SL
-
Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
-
Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
-
Highways Act 1980
-
Planning Act 2008
-
Cuadrilla Bowland Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land at Little Plumpton as More Particularly Described in the Claim form and Shown Edged Red on the Plan Annexed to the Claim Form
-
(1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
-
Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
-
Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
-
Human Rights Act 1998
-
National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown deliberately causing the blocking, slowing down, obstructing or otherwise interfering with the flow of traffic onto or off or along the strategic road network for the purpose of protesting and Others
-
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Elliott Cuciurean
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others
-
Shell v Persons Unknown