R.R v L.M.R

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)

CONSIDERS

• Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991

REFERS TO

• W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• B v B (Child Abduction)
• A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)

[See more]

• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• R v R
• F.L v C.L
• M and another (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) Re
• M (Children)
• R (S) v R (S)
• C A v C A (otherwise C McC)
• U (A) v U (TN)
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991, and the Hague Convention, and ANU and AWU (Children), between AU v TNU
• R v R
• K.W. v P.W.
• JW v MR
• JJ v PJ

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2017] 9 JIC 1701

This document cites

• M and another (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) Re
• JW v MR
• U (A) v U (TN)
• R v R
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)



See all quotations

• R v R
• R (S) v R (S)
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991, and the Hague Convention, and ANU and AWU (Children), between AU v TNU
• M (Children)
• JJ v PJ
• K.W. v P.W.
• F.L v C.L
• B v B (Child Abduction)
• K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• C A v C A (otherwise C McC)
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• A.S. v P.S. (Child Abduction)
• Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000
• Convention on the Rights of the Child