Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Kapur v Kapur

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)

AFFIRMS

• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)

CONSIDERS

• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 - Articles : SCH-1
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1990] UKHL J0726-4
• [1990] 2 All ER 961
• [1990] 3 WLR 492

[See more]

• [1990] 2 FLR 442
• [31/07/1990] TLR 3
• 125 NR 145
• [1990] 2 AC 562

APPLIED in

• Re S (Minors) (Child Abduction: Wrongful Retention)
• Cox v Cox
• Re Ayf

REFERRED in

• Mr and Mrs A v Mr and Mrs I
• Bridgend County Borough Council v G M and Another
• I (A Child) v J (A Child)

[See more]

• Mr B v Mr and Mrs E and Another
• VK v JV (Abduction)
• R (A Child: Habitual Residence)
• Re G (Abduction: Withdrawal of Proceedings, Acquiescence, Habitual Residence)
• K v K (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)
• M (C) v Delegation Provincal De Malaga Consejeria De Trabajoe
• Re F (Child Abduction: Risk if Returned)
• S (A) v S(C)
• Re L (A Child) (Custody: Habitual Residence)

CONSIDERED in

• Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council v S and Others London Borough of Brent (Fourth Respondent)
• Sheffield CC v Bradford CC
• Re N (Child Abduction: Habitual Residence)

[See more]

• LK v Director-General, Department of Community Services
• A.S. v S.S.
• Hunter v Murrow
• Ms SS(first Plaintiff) v Separate Representative for the Child Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services (first Defendant)
• K v N
• Re I-L (Children) (1996 Hague Child Protection Convention: Inherent Jurisdiction)
• Z (S) v T (S)
• A.S. v M.S.
• A.M. v S.McG
• Re S (Custody: Habitual Residence)
• Re G-E (Children) (Hague Convention 1980: Repudiatory Retention and Habitual Residence)
• Bu (A) v Be (J)
• Al Habtoor v Fotheringham
• S (A) v S (C)
• F v S (Wardship: Jurisdiction)
• Re K (A Child) (Northern Ireland)
• Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence) (Inherent Jurisdiction)
• Re C (A Child) (Unmarried Father: Custody Rights)
• Re J (A Child) (Finland)(Habitual Residence)
• D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody); Re
• HI v MG
• E (D) v B (E)
• D.T. v I.B.
• LC (Children)
• K v K
• A v A (Children: Habitual Residence)
• A v A (Children: Habitual Residence)
• An Application Under the 1980 Hague Convention Re P (A Child)
• CK Between: DT Applicant v IK Respondent
• NB Plaintiff v SB Defendant
• Cms Petitioner v Rgs Respondent
• CK Between: DT Applicant v IK Respondent
• An application under the 1980 Hague Convention v Re P (A Child)
• Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda Applicant v Michael Gerard Moore Respondent [ECSC]
• Y and X

CITED in

• Commonwealth Central Authority & Wageman
• Lcg v Rl
• R v A

[See more]

• B (E) v G (A)
• Department of Family and Community Services & Svoboda (No. 2)
• S (A P) v S (A F)
• Re S (A Minor) (Custody: Habitual Residence)
• Ward of Court (Pvs)
• C.M. v Delegaci¢n de Malaga
• VK and AK v KK and in the matter of the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• Re S, N and C (Non-Hague Convention Abduction: Habitual Residence: Child's Views)
• AM (a minor)’s Application and in the matter of the Child Abduction and Custody act 1985
• Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence: Inherent Jurisdiction)
• Gt v Kao
• Re H (Children) (Jurisdiction: Habitual residence)

This document cites

• Kapur v Kapur
• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985