Westminster City Council v Haw
Linked as:
Extract
Westminster City Council v Haw
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERED in
- West Midlands International Airport Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
- Michael Buchanan v The Crown Prosecution Service
- (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
NOT FOLLOWED in
CITED in
- Kelly Minio-Paluello v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- R (Haw) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
REFERRED in
- UK Oil & Gas Investments Plc (2) Kimmeridge Oil & Gas Ltd (3) Magellan Petroleum (UK) Ltd (4) Horse Hill Developments Ltd (5) UKOG (GB) Ltd v Persons unknown Who are Protestors against the Exploration and/or Extraction of Mineral Oil or Relative Hydrocarbon or Natural Gas by the Claimant(s) and Who are Involved in the Following Acts or any of them:
- R Maria Gallastegui v Westminster City Council The Commissioner for the Metropolis (First Interested Party) The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Second Interested Party)
- Director of Public Prosecutions v Nora Ziegler
