Dick et Al v R

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Nelson
• R v Wilbourne Walters and Edward Walters
• R v Brathwaite No 2

[See more]

• Mills and Gomes v R
• Maxwell v DPP
• R v Hayes
• R v Moghal
• R v Richards
• Kwaku Mensah v The King
• Howard v Commissioner of Police
• Bullard v The Queen
• R v Letenock
• R v Clynes
• R v McInnes
• George Smith
• Phillips and Lutchman v R
• R v Prater
• R v Maxwell (Note)
• DPP v Smith
• Ibrahim v R
• Opinions given by the Judges, in Answer to certain Questions of Evidence put to (The Queen's Case)
• R v Grondkowski, R v Malinowski
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
• R v Gibbins (also known as Gibbons) and Proctor
• R v Angeli
• The King v Brasier
• R v Day
• R v Cascoe
• R v Khan (Lal)
• Surujpaul v The Queen
• Smith v Worrell
• David and Watkins v R
• R v Boodram Lall
• R v Whitfield (Melvyn)
• Anthony Williams v R
• R v Reginald Corrodus and Kenneth Corrodus
• R v Smith (Wesley)
• Daniel Powell v R
• Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales
• Hyam v DPP
• R v Southern
• Edwards v The Queen
• Palmer v The Queen; Irving v The Queen
• R v Tilley
• Holmes v DPP
• R v Clark
• R v Hall
• R v Gunewardene
• The State v Rudolph Baichandeen
• Rolle v The Queen
• R v Duffy (Note)
• London General Omnibus Company v Lavell
• R v Barnes and another
• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• Pooran v R
• Frank Sookram v The State
• R v Lesbini
• Chan Kau v The Queen
• The State v Gowkarran Persaud, Jowalla Persaud and Michael Boodram
• R v Fitzpatrick
• Gokool and Gokool v R
• R v Balgobin
• R v Warickshall
• Karamat v The Queen
• R v Lake
• Cole v United Dairies (London)
• R v Campbell
• Johnson v Youden
• R v Gilbert (Raymond)
• R v Warwar
• Harris v DPP
• Noor Mohamed v The King
• R v Richard
• R v Harden
• Mancini v DPP
• R v O'Sullivan
• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• Jamaica Railway Corporation v Duff
• R v Kilbourne
• R v Porritt
• The State v Abdool Azim Sattaur and Rafeek Mohamed
• R v Chapman
• Johnson v R

CONSIDERS

• Petroleum Revenue Tax Act 1980 - Articles : S-1

This document cites

• California - 83 Cal.App.2d 405, 655, People v. Doggett
• Iowa - 27 Iowa 503 (Iowa. 1869), Close v. Samm
• Kentucky - 17 S.W. 183 (Ky.App. 1891), Dorsey v. Commonwealth
• Kentucky - 201 S.W. 475 (Ky.App. 1918), Parker v. Commonwealth
• Vermont - 132 A.2d 623 (Vt. 1957), 1286, State v. Lionel R. Goyet



See all quotations

• West Virginia - 180 S.E. 1 (W.Va. 1935), 8074, Moore v. Lowe
• R v Khan (Lal)
• R v O'Sullivan
• Maxwell v DPP
• George Smith
• Mancini v DPP
• R v Gilbert (Raymond)
• Hyam v DPP
• R v Whitfield (Melvyn)
• R v Richards
• R v Chapman
• R v Moghal
• R v Lake
• R v Maxwell (Note)
• DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• R v Angeli
• R v Kilbourne
• R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
• R v Cascoe
• Harris v DPP
• R v McInnes
• Johnson v Youden
• R v Nelson
• Pooran v R
• R v Boodram Lall
• Frank Sookram v The State
• The State v Gowkarran Persaud, Jowalla Persaud and Michael Boodram
• The State v Abdool Azim Sattaur and Rafeek Mohamed
• The State v Rudolph Baichandeen