DPP v Smith

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Road Traffic Act 1988 - Articles : S-7
• Homicide Act 1957 - Articles : S-1
• Homicide Act 1957 - Articles : S-5

[See more]

• R v Ashman
• R v Vamplew
• Hosegood v Hosegood

REVERSES

• R v Smith

ACLARA

• R v Steane

APPROVES

• R v Ward
• R v Vickers

REFERS TO

• R v Smith

CONSIDERED in

• R v Williamson (Anthony)
• R v Peter Salvo Bryan
• Jackson v The State

[See more]

• Jackson (Warren) v The State
• R v John James Dennis
• R v Taylor (Christopher Stephen)
• R v Joseph Michael Shevlin
• Michael Bruce Clarke v R (Respondent Crown)
• R v Sancar
• Michael John Neal v The Queen
• The Queen v Stuart Lee
• Roger Lee Vann v Craig Michael Palmer
• The Queen v Alex Niceski
• The Queen v Robert David Hugh Cameron
• R v Grant
• R v Renny Goonerage
• Rosenburg v R
• The Queen v John Alexander Matthews
• The Queen v Yon Soo Choe
• The Queen v Rodney Stewart Howes
• R v Connor O'Casey
• ST v R
• Swan v R
• R v Hancock and Another
• Lucio Robert Paciocco and Another v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
• R v Hancock and Another
• R v Cunningham
• Vincent v R
• Nuku v R Coa
• Generics (UK) Ltd trading as Mylan v Warner-Lambert Company LLC
• R v Lewis (Mitchell)
• Tench v R
• R v Hamilton
• Cadogan (Tyrone) v R (No 1)
• Cadogan v R
• The State v Sookraj Evans
• The State v Kowshall Persaud
• Bowers v R
• Bucket v R
• Marcus v R
• R v Bovell
• R v Brown
• Watson v R
• R v Reid
• Fiona Miller v Dennis Webb
• Weekes et Al v The Queen
• The King v Marlon Joseph
• Johnson v R
• Fiona Miller v Dennis Webb
• The King v Marlon Joseph
• Tench v R
• The State v Mitchell
• Bowers v R
• R v Bovell
• Commissioner of Police v Fritz
• Cadogan v R
• R v Reid
• People v Douglas
• Velasquez v E K et Al
• Re Kevin Brown
• The Queen v Lewis
• Hyam v DPP
• Matthews v The State
• R v Miller
• DPP v Smith
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Crawford
• DPP v Andrzej Benko
• The State v Evans
• R v Chan-Fook
• Hyam v DPP
• Springer v The Queen
• State v Sharma et Al
• The State v Sharma et Al
• Johnson v R
• Dick et Al v R
• Narine v The State
• Orosco v The State
• R v Matthews (Darren John); R v Alleyne (Brian Dean)
• R v Belfon
• R v Lavender
• R v Jeli Ogunbowale
• Nurse v R
• R Ats. Thorpe v Molyneaux
• Navarro and Company Ltd v Kingston
• R v Cunningham
• Whitehouse v Gay News Ltd
• DPP v Morgan, ; DPP v McDonald, ; DPP v McLarty, ; DPP v Parker,
• Thomas and Another v Baptiste and Others
• R v Pagett
• R v Kenneth Bryson
• The State v Persaud

REFERRED in

• R v Ives
• R v Grimwood
• Viro v R

[See more]

• DPP v Smith
• R v Cooper (Anthony)
• R v Hancock
• R (Tait) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel
• Chee Kim Seng and Another v PP
• R v Morgan
• PP; Yeo Ah Seng
• R v Lemon R v Gay News Ltd
• R v Nicholas Doyle
• R v Majewski
• Paal Wilson & Company A/S v Partenreederei Hannah Blumenthal
• Collins (Devon) v R
• R v Majewski
• Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation)
• DPP v Keith Kirwan
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Crawford
• R v Woollin
• [1]Henry Weekes [2] Everette Crump [3] Kenaz Whyte [4] Paul Ephraim [5] Kester Bailey [6] Dale Christian Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• OPO (by his litigation friend) and another v Rhodes

DISTINGUISHED in

• R v Grimwood
• R v Sharmpal Singh; The Queen v Sharmpal Singh
• R v Wallett

NOT APPLIED in

• Balcombe v De Simoni

CITED in

• S. & M. Hotels Ltd v Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd
• Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation)
• Cfmeu v John Holland Pty Ltd

[See more]

• R v Shaun Lee Hill
• The State v Parbhu Sharma and Lambert Williams
• Reid v R
• R v Pryme and Holmes
• R v Symonds
• Menzies v R
• Bucket v R
• R v Mowatt
• R v Symonds
• R v BM
• R v Hancock
• R v Woollin
• DPP v Andrzej Benko
• The Queen Appellant v Mitchell Ken O'Neal Lewis Respondent
• PGA v The Queen
• Menzies v The Queen
• R v Brown Lucas Jaggard Laskey Carter (Conjoined Appeals)

FOLLOWED in

• Chee Kim Seng and Another v PP

DISAPPROVED in

• Frankland v The Queen
• Harold Berbick and Kenton Gordon v R
• R v Moloney

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Goh Yoke v PP

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1960] 3 All ER 161
• 44 CrAppR 261
• [1960] 124 JP 473

[See more]

• [1960] 104 SJ 683
• [1960] 3 WLR 546
• [1961] AC 290

CLARIFIED in

• Hardy v Motor Insurers' Bureau
• Hardy v Motor Insurers' Bureau

APPLIED in

• R v Janjua ; R v Choudhury

This document cites

---

• Hosegood v Hosegood
• R v Smith
• R v Ward
• R v Vamplew
• R v Joen Cox



See all quotations

• R v Ashman
• R v Vickers
• R v Steane
• National Debt Act 1802
• Homicide Act 1957