Chan Kau v The Queen

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• R v Smith
• Mancini v DPP
• HM Advocate v Doherty

[See more]

• Woolmington v DPP
• Latimer v A. E. C. Ltd

APPLIES

• Teper v The Queen

APPLIED in

• R v Lobell

CITED in

• R v Howe
• Zecevic v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Victoria)

REFERRED in

• Thomas v R
• Da Costa v R
• Othman Mat v PP

[See more]

• Palmer v The Queen; Irving v The Queen

CONSIDERED in

• Palmer v R
• Conway v R
• Royer v R

[See more]

• Hetsberger v The State
• The State v Robert Lewis
• Wilson v R
• Ames (Royston) v The State
• The State v Singh (Clement)
• R v Talbot and Kerr
• The State v Gonputh (Donald)
• Thomas (Keith) v The State
• Vaux (Daniel) and Vaux (Kornel) v The State
• The State v Wong
• Johnson v R
• Baptiste v The State
• Vaux et Al v The State
• Bholanauth v The State
• Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
• Mcintosh v R
• Wong v The State
• Dick et Al v R
• Baptiste v The State
• The State v Singh
• The State v Lewis
• Palmer v R

FOLLOWED in

• Othman Mat v PP
• Mat Sawi bin Bahodin v PP
• Looi Wooi Saik v Public Prosecutor

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1955] 1 All ER 266
• [1955] 2 WLR 192
• [1955] AC 206