Frank Sookram v The State

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - Articles : S-20
• Johnson v R
• Stirland v DPP

[See more]

• R v Haddy
• Kwaku Mensah v The King
• R v Steane
• R v Lobell
• Bullard v The Queen
• R v Mowatt

CITES

• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• R v Charlson (Stanley)
• R v Mowatt

[See more]

• Palmer v The Queen; Irving v The Queen
• R v Porritt

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1971) 18 WIR 195

CONSIDERED in

• Omar v The State
• Wong v The State
• The State v Mootoosammy & Budhoo

[See more]

• Javaro Davis v R
• Sewkaran v The State
• Ibrahim et Al v The State
• Dick et Al v R
• Mcintosh v R
• The State v Singh
• Clarence Francis Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

CITED in

• The State v Ashraf Haniff
• Price v The State
• Mohamed Omar v The State

[See more]

• The State v Singh (Clement)
• Gordon (Michael) v The State
• Shazam Ibrahim and Surendranauth Chattergoon v The State
• Hardat Ketwaru v The State
• Shivnarine and another v The State
• The State v Alfred

This document cites

• R v Mowatt
• Stirland v DPP
• R v Charlson (Stanley)
• Kwaku Mensah v The King
• Palmer v The Queen; Irving v The Queen



See all quotations

• R v Lobell
• Johnson v R
• R v Mowatt
• R v Haddy
• R v Porritt
• Bullard v The Queen
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• R v Steane