Cooper v Board of Works for the Wandsworth Destrict

Core Citations

COMMENTED in

• Wotton v State of Queensland

CITED in

• Saraceni v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
• Federal Airports Corporation v Aerolineas Argentinas
• Delta Properties Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council

[See more]

• Commissioner of Police v Tanos
• Nemuseso v Minister for Immigration
• Laffer v Gillen
• R v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Ratu
• The King (Ahern) v Recorder of Cork
• R (on the application of Delve and another) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• AM (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2)
• [1] Siobahn Nicola Gillespie [2] Citco BVI Ltd Claimants v The Minister of Natural Resources and Labour Defendant

REFERRED in

• Federal Airports Corporation v Aerolineas Argentinas
• Fletcher v Manton
• Heatley v Tasmanian Racing and Gaming Commission

[See more]

• Fai Insurances Ltd v Winneke
• Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd
• Hutton v Attorney General
• Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
• R v Greenwich London Borough Council, ex parte Patel
• Attorney-General (Nsw) v Quin
• Tan Kim Hock Product Centre Sdn Bhd and Another v Tan Kim Hock Tong Seng Food Industry Sdn Bhd
• Director General of Immigration, Malaysia and Others; JP Berthelsen
• Salemi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs
• Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Keretapi Tanah Melayu Bhd v Menteri Sumber Manusia and Others
• Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Bukan Eksekutif Maybank Bhd v Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja-pekerja Bank and Another
• Ho Kwan Seng; Ketua Pengarah Kastam
• Islamic Renaissance Front Berhad v The Minister of Home Affairs
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
• Valentine v Jackson
• R (JW) v Dr G Feggetter and Mental Health Act Commission; R (Wooder) v Feggetter
• Citizens UK, R v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Government of the United States of America) v Bow Street Magistrates Court
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• R (UMBS Online Ltd) v Serious Organised Crime Agency
• Norwest Holst Ltd v Secretary of State for Trade
• Vhandel (Owen) v Board of Management, Guy's Hill High School
• R (Khatun and Others) v Newham London Borough Council
• R v Life Assurance Unit Trust Regulatory Organisation Ltd, ex parte Ross
• Chief Building Surveyor v Makhanlall & Company Ltd
• The Queen (on the application of Citizens UK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Premier League Ltd Claimant v The Attroney General Defendant [ECSC]
• R v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Hook
• Ridge v Baldwin
• R (Khatun and Others) v Newham London Borough Council
• Wiseman v Borneman
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson

CONSIDERED in

• Twist v Randwick Municipal Council
• R v London Borough of Lambeth ex parte Walters
• Sydney Corporation v Harris

[See more]

• Minister for Local Government and Another v South Sydney City Council
• Re Andrew
• The Queen v The Chairman of the Parole Board of the Northern Territory; ex parte: Darrell Ross Patterson [NTR]
• Tennant Creek Trading Pty Ltd, Whyteross Pty Ltd, Charles Keith Hallett and Tennant Creek Hotel Pty Ltd v The Liquor Commission of the Northern Territory of Australia and Julalikari Council Aboriginal Corporation
• Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal
• Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
• CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
• Metropolitan Petar v Mitreski
• Bell v Tasmania
• Ridge (A.P.) v Baldwin and Others
• Valentine v Jackson
• Allesch v Maunz
• Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Miah
• Dotcom, Batato, Ortmann and Van Der Kolk v The United States of America
• Walapu v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
• The King on the application of KT v Office of the Independent Adjudicator
• The King (on the application of MS Helen Timson) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• Murray v Legal Services Commissioner and Another
• MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Another
• Disorganized Developments Pty Ltd v South Australia
• Re the Caymanian Protection Law (Revised)
• Symes v The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica
• Re Guyana Telephone and Telegraph Company Ltd
• The Grand Bahama Port Authority Ltd v Carter
• Munisar v Bookers Demerra Sugar Estates Ltd et Al
• Marks v Minister of Home Affairs
• Matthie v Minister of Education
• Blake All E.R v Barker
• R v Commissioner of Police (ex parte Winston Tennant)
• Davis v Attorney General et Al
• Huntley v Attorney General et Al
• Re Johnson Leslie
• Premier League Ltd v Attorney General
• Bahadur v A.G. of T & T
• Football Federation of Belize v National Sports Coincil et Al
• Elliott Associates L.P. v The London Metal Exchange
• Lopinot Limestone Ltd v The Attorney General
• Globe Detective and Protective Agency Ltd et Al v Commissioner of Police et Al
• The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd
• Easton v Attorney General
• Boyce et Al v Commissioner of Police et Al; Robinson v Commissioner of Police et Al; Ellis v Commissioner of Police et Al
• Maria Hutchinson v Belize teaching Service Commission
• The King (on the application of) Ms Helen Timson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• The Major, Alderman and Burgesses of San Fernando v Ramlogan
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Re Errol E. Niles (No.2)
• Ulric ‘buggy’ Haynes Coaching School et Al v Minister of Planning and Sustainable Development
• Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
• Rahaman et Al v Attorney General and Deeds Registry Authority Corporation
• Linton C. Allen v His Excellency the Right Hon. Sir Patrick Allen
• Forde v Durant (Commissioner of Police)
• Mahabir v Director of Land Administration
• Attorney General v K.C. Confectionery Ltd
• Hon. Shawn K. Richards Claimant v The Constituency Boundaries Commission 1st Defendant Attorney General of St. Christopher and Nevis 2nd Defendant [ECSC]
• Magnum Investment Trading Corporation v The Attorney General of the British Virgin Islands
• [1] Hon. Shawn K. Richards [2] Hon. Timothy Harris [3] Hon. Eugene A. Hamilton [4] Hon. Mark Brantley Applicants v [1] The Constituency Boundaries Commission [2] His Excellency the Governor General [3] The Prime Minister of St. Christopher and Nevis [4] Attorney General of St Christopher and Nevis Respondents [ECSC]
• Lasalle et Al v R
• Bernard v Mayor, Aldermen, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Port of Spain
• Brandt v The Attorney General and Austin
• Section 17(2) of The Immigration Law (2013 Revision) an Application for Permanent Residence and Employment Rights by Michelle Jean Hutchinson-Green an Application for Permanent Residence and Employment Rights by Alisha Myriah Racz
• Mucklow v The Minister of Home Affairs

FOLLOWED in

• Smith v Police Commissioner
• The Representation of Centenier Pearce

APPLIED in

• Durayappah v Fernando

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 14 CB NS 180
• 143 ER 414

ADOPTED in

• Bank Mellat v HM Treasury

This document cites

• Attorney General v Hooper
• Capel v Child
• Dickson v The Neath and Brecon Railway Company