Smith v Police Commissioner

Core Citations

CITES

• Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another
• De Verteuil v Knaggs
• Durayappah v Fernando

[See more]

• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Buckoke v Greater London Council
• Capel v Child
• Lapointe v L'Association de Bienfaisance et de Retraite de la Police de Montréal
• Leeson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration
• Re H. K. (an Infant)
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• Pett v Greyhound Racing Association Ltd
• R v Barnsley Licensing Justices. ex parte Barnsley and District Licensed Victuallers' Association
• Merricks v Nott-Bower
• Nagle v Feilden
• R v Industrial Injuries Commissioner.ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union (No. 2)
• R v London County Council
• R v Legislative Committee of the Church Assembly, ex parte Haynes-Smith
• R v Liverpool Corpn.ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association
• R v Metropolitan Police Commissioner. ex parte Holloway
• The King against the Chancellor, Masters, and Scholars of the University of Cambridge
• R v Sunderland Justices
• Leeds Corporation v Ryder
• Franklin and Others v Minister of Town and Country Planning
• R v Housing Appeal Tribunal
• Wiseman v Borneman

FOLLOWS

• Sharp v Wakefield and Others
• Local Government Board v Arlidge
• General Medical Council v Spackman

[See more]

• Cooper v Board of Works for the Wandsworth Destrict
• McInnes v Onslow-Fane
• R v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Hook
• Ridge v Baldwin

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Fry, ex parte
• Nakkuda Ali v M. F. de S. Jayaratne
• R v Metropolitan Police Commissioner ex parte Parker

CONSIDERS

• R v Electricity Comrs.ex parte London Electricity Joint Committee Company
• R v Board of Visitors of Hull Prison, ex parte St Germain
• Osgood v Nelson

[See more]

• Liversidge v Anderson
• Daemar v Hall

APPLIES

• The Queen against The Archbishop of Canterbury
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• R v Brighton Corporation, ex parte Thomas Tilling Ltd

[See more]

• Baker v The Queen
• Banks v Transport Regulation Board (Victoria)
• Bazie v Attorney General
• Board of Education v Rice

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1980-83 CILR 126

CONSIDERED in

• Between Island Pools Ltd Applicant v The Summary Court of The Cayman Islands Respondent
• Between Feline Friends Ltd Applicant v The Cabinet of the Cayman Islands Respondent and The National Conservation Council Interested Party
• Between Island Pools Ltd Applicant v The Summary Court of the Cayman Islands Respondent

[See more]

• The Companies Act (2023 Revision) and HQP Corporation Ltd (in official liquidation)
• The Companies Act (2023 Revision) and HQP Corporation Ltd (in Official Liquidation)
• (1) BDO Cayman Ltd (2) Deloitte and Touche (3) Ernst & Young Ltd (4) KPMG (5) Pricewaterhousecoopers Applicants v (1) The Governor in Cabinet (2) The Attorney General Respondents

This document cites

• Fry, ex parte
• Local Government Board v Arlidge
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• Wiseman v Borneman
• Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another



See all quotations

• Merricks v Nott-Bower
• R v Liverpool Corpn.ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association
• R v Industrial Injuries Commissioner.ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union (No. 2)
• Buckoke v Greater London Council
• R v Board of Visitors of Hull Prison, ex parte St Germain
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• R v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Hook
• Nagle v Feilden
• Pett v Greyhound Racing Association Ltd
• Franklin and Others v Minister of Town and Country Planning
• Sharp v Wakefield and Others
• Liversidge v Anderson
• R v Barnsley Licensing Justices. ex parte Barnsley and District Licensed Victuallers' Association
• Broome v Cassell & Company Ltd
• Leeds Corporation v Ryder
• R v Metropolitan Police Commissioner. ex parte Holloway
• R v Electricity Comrs.ex parte London Electricity Joint Committee Company
• R v Sunderland Justices
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• McInnes v Onslow-Fane
• The Queen against The Archbishop of Canterbury
• Baker v The Queen
• Board of Education v Rice
• Leeson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration
• Fry, ex parte
• R v Housing Appeal Tribunal
• Capel v Child
• The King against the Chancellor, Masters, and Scholars of the University of Cambridge
• R v Brighton Corporation, ex parte Thomas Tilling Ltd