[1] Siobahn Nicola Gillespie [2] Citco BVI Ltd Claimants v The Minister of Natural Resources and Labour Defendant

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Ermakov
• R v Northamptonshire County Council ex parte D

APPLIES

• South Bucks District Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another

CONSIDERS

• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3)
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-2
• Divorce Reform Act 1969 - Articles : S-2
• McInnes v Onslow-Fane
• Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design

REFERS TO

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• Santos v Santos
• Fuller v Fuller

CITES

• Cooper v Board of Works for the Wandsworth Destrict
• Ridge v Baldwin
• Durayappah v Fernando

[See more]

• Wiseman v Borneman
• O'Reilly v Mackman
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• Marks v Minister of Home Affairs
• R (Murungaru) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
• R v Assistant Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Howell
• Naidike and Others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• R v Huntingdon District Council, ex parte Cowan
• Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd v Crabtree
• Jaroo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Warr v Warr

This document cites

• O'Reilly v Mackman
• Fuller v Fuller
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• Wiseman v Borneman
• Santos v Santos



See all quotations

• Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• R (Murungaru) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
• McInnes v Onslow-Fane
• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• Warr v Warr
• R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Ermakov
• R v Huntingdon District Council, ex parte Cowan
• Durayappah v Fernando
• Naidike and Others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Jaroo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Ridge v Baldwin
• Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd v Crabtree
• R v Assistant Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Howell
• R v Northamptonshire County Council ex parte D
• Cooper v Board of Works for the Wandsworth Destrict
• Marks v Minister of Home Affairs
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• South Bucks District Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3)