Extract
Magnum Investment Trading Corporation v The Attorney General of the British Virgin Islands
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
-
Norris v Government of the United States of America
-
Durant International Corporation, Sun Diamond Ltd, Kildare Finance Ltd and MacDoel Investments Ltd v Attorney General and Federal Republic of Brazil
-
Wastell and Another v Stanford International Bank Ltd and Another Serious Fraud Office (Intervening)
[See more]
-
R (Omar) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
-
The Queen on the applications of and Others v (1) The Crown Court at Southwark (1st Defendant) (2) The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and other Interested Parties (2nd Defendant)
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
-
Acturus Properties Ltd and 47 others v Att Gen [Royal Ct]
-
Salomon v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
-
R (Bright) v Central Criminal Court
-
Cooper v Board of Works for the Wandsworth Destrict
-
Maclaine Watson & Company Ltd v International Tin Council
-
Durant International Corporation, Sun Diamond Ltd, Kildare Finance Ltd and MacDoel Investments Ltd v Attorney General and Federal Republic of Brazil
-
Crown Prosecution Service and another v Gohil and another
-
Abacha and Others v Secretary of State for Home Department
-
R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte Propend Finance Property Ltd
-
R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
-
R v Crown Court at Southampton, ex parte J and P
-
R v Lewes Crown Court, ex parte Hill
-
Energy Financing Team Ltd v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind
-
Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd
-
R (Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees and Others) v Central Criminal Court and Another Vincent Tchenguiz and (Interested Party)
-
(1) Jp Morgan Chase Bank National Association; (2) Depfa Bank Plc; (3) UBS Ltd; (4) Deutsche Bank Ag v (1) The Director of the Serious Fraud Office; (2) The Secretary of State for the Home Department Public Prosecutor of Milan (Interested Party)
-
R v Ebanks, ex p Henderson
-
Chatwani and Others v National Crime Agency
-
R (S and Others) v Chief Constable of the British Transport Police and another
-
Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design
-
R v Birmingham City District Council, ex parte O
-
R (on the application of Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans and another
-
JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshlenniy Bank and Another v Sergei Viktorovich Pugachev (Defendant/Applicant)
-
R (Unaenergy Group Holding Pte Ltd and Others) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
-
R (Wood) v North Avon Magistrates Court
-
R (on the application of Mills) v Sussex Police
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another, ex parte Fininvest SpA and Others
-
R (Ireneschild) v Lambeth London BC
-
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
-
Mamdouh Ismail v Secretary of State for Home Department
-
R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Ermakov
-
R v Northamptonshire County Council ex parte D
CONSIDERS
This document cites
-
Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
-
United States of America v. McVey, (1992) 144 N.R. 81 (SCC)
-
R (on the application of Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans and another
-
R (S and Others) v Chief Constable of the British Transport Police and another
-
R (Omar) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
See all quotations
-
Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind
-
R (on the application of Mills) v Sussex Police
-
ROBERT TCHENGUIZ and Others v THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE HM PROCUREUR for GUERNSEY (Intervenor)
-
R (Unaenergy Group Holding Pte Ltd and Others) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
-
The Queen on the applications of and Others v (1) The Crown Court at Southwark (1st Defendant) (2) The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and other Interested Parties (2nd Defendant)
-
R v Birmingham City District Council, ex parte O
-
JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshlenniy Bank and Another v Sergei Viktorovich Pugachev (Defendant/Applicant)
-
R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
-
R (Soma Oil and Gas Ltd) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
-
Belhaj and another v Straw and Others; Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence and another (No 2)
-
Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design
-
Abacha and Others v Secretary of State for Home Department
-
Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Another v Rossminster Ltd .; Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Another v AJR Financial Services Ltd .; Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Another v Plummer .; Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Another v Tucker,
-
Wastell and Another v Stanford International Bank Ltd and Another Serious Fraud Office (Intervening)
-
Salomon v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
-
Maclaine Watson & Company Ltd v International Tin Council
-
R (Wood) v North Avon Magistrates Court
-
R (Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees and Others) v Central Criminal Court and Another Vincent Tchenguiz and (Interested Party)
-
Crown Prosecution Service and another v Gohil and another
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
-
R (Ireneschild) v Lambeth London BC
-
(1) Jp Morgan Chase Bank National Association; (2) Depfa Bank Plc; (3) UBS Ltd; (4) Deutsche Bank Ag v (1) The Director of the Serious Fraud Office; (2) The Secretary of State for the Home Department Public Prosecutor of Milan (Interested Party)
-
Mamdouh Ismail v Secretary of State for Home Department
-
Norris v Government of the United States of America
-
Cherney v Deripaska (No 2)
-
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
-
R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Ermakov
-
Durant International Corporation, Sun Diamond Ltd, Kildare Finance Ltd and MacDoel Investments Ltd v Attorney General and Federal Republic of Brazil
-
R v Crown Court at Southampton, ex parte J and P
