Extract
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
-
Harrison Jalla and Others v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company
-
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan and Others
-
Hole v Chard Union
[See more]
-
Job Edwards Ltd v Birmingham Navigations
-
Goldman v Hargrave
-
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
-
Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd; Maloco v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
-
Lawrence (Katherine) and Another v Fen Tigers Ltd & others (No 1)
-
Fearn and Others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery
-
Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd
-
Cooper v Board of Works for the Wandsworth Destrict
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
-
Manchester, Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of the City of v Farnworth
-
Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd
-
Oldaker v Hunt
-
Attorney General v The Council of The Borough of Birmingham
-
Attorney-General v Leeds Corporation
-
The Queen against The Darlington Local Board of Health
-
The Queen, on the Prosecution of Thomas Taylor, against The Darlington Local Board of Health
-
Goldsmid v Tunbridge Wells Improvement Commissioners
-
Attorney General v Hackney Local Board
-
Robinson v Corporation of Workington
-
Pasmore and Others v Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council
-
Doe dem. Murray, Lord Bishop of Rochester, against Bridges, 1831
-
Durrant v Branksome Urban District Council
-
Baron v Portslade Urban Council
-
Attorney General v Lewes Corporation
-
Price's Patent Candle Company v London County Council
-
Jones v Llanrwst Urban Council
-
Pride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd and Earl of Harrington v British Celanese Ltd
-
Smeaton v Ilford Corporation
-
John Young and Company v Bankier Distillery Company
-
British Waterways Board v Severn Trent Water Ltd
-
Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd
-
Hanifa Dobson and Others v Thames Water Utilities Ltd and The Water Services Regulation Authority
-
Ms Julie Marion Nicholson v Thames Water Utilities Ltd Mts Cleansing Services Ltd (Third Party)
-
Mr Sydney Bell and Another v Northumbrian Water Ltd
-
Lee Dennis Oldcorn and Another v Southern Water Services Ltd
-
Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
-
Department of Transport v North West Water Authority
-
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd
-
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd
-
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
-
Radstock Co-operative and Industrial Society Ltd v Norton-Radstock Urban District Council
-
Jaggard v Sawyer
-
Morris-Garner and another v One Step (Support) Ltd
-
Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
-
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Total Network SL
REFERRED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites
-
Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
-
Morris-Garner and another v One Step (Support) Ltd
-
Lee Dennis Oldcorn and Another v Southern Water Services Ltd
-
Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
-
Department of Transport v North West Water Authority
See all quotations
-
Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd
-
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan and Others
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
-
Ms Julie Marion Nicholson v Thames Water Utilities Ltd Mts Cleansing Services Ltd (Third Party)
-
British Waterways Board v Severn Trent Water Ltd
-
Radstock Co-operative and Industrial Society Ltd v Norton-Radstock Urban District Council
-
Jaggard v Sawyer
-
Mr Sydney Bell and Another v Northumbrian Water Ltd
-
Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd
-
Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
-
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
-
Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd
-
Pasmore and Others v Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council
-
Manchester, Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of the City of v Farnworth
-
Pride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd and Earl of Harrington v British Celanese Ltd
-
Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd; Maloco v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
-
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Total Network SL
-
Attorney General v The Council of The Borough of Birmingham
-
Durrant v Branksome Urban District Council
-
Robinson v Corporation of Workington
-
Doe d. Rochester (Bp.) v Bridges
-
Price's Patent Candle Company v London County Council
-
Oldaker v Hunt
-
Smeaton v Ilford Corporation
-
Attorney-General v Leeds Corporation
-
Doe dem. Murray, Lord Bishop of Rochester, against Bridges, 1831
-
Attorney General v Lewes Corporation
-
The Queen, on the Prosecution of Thomas Taylor, against The Darlington Local Board of Health
-
The Queen against The Darlington Local Board of Health