CAA v Singapore Airlines

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1949 - Articles : S-24
• State Immunity Act 1978
• Mighell v Sultan of Johore

[See more]

• Duff Development Company v Kelantan Government
• Gur Corporation v Trust Bank of Africa Ltd

DISTINGUISHES

• Re Al-Fin Corporation's Patent

REFERS TO

• Sayce v Ameer Ruler Dadig Mohammad Abbasi Bahavalpur State
• Upright v Mercury Business Machines Company
• Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company

[See more]

• The City of Berne in Switzerland v The Bank of England

FOLLOWS

• The Arantzazu Mendi

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2004] SGCA 3
• [2004] 1 SLR 570
• 133 ILR 371

REFERRED in

• Tan Sri Musa Hj Aman and Others v Tun Datuk SeriPanglima Hj Juhar Hj Mahiruddin and Others

This document cites

• Gur Corporation v Trust Bank of Africa Ltd
• Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others (Original Appeal) and Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others v Courts and Others (Cross Appeal)
• Duff Development Company v Kelantan Government
• Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
• Mighell v Sultan of Johore



See all quotations

• Sayce v Ameer Ruler Dadig Mohammad Abbasi Bahavalpur State
• Re Al-Fin Corporation's Patent
• The City of Berne in Switzerland v The Bank of England
• Aksionairnoye Obschestvo A. M. Luther v Sagor & Company
• The Arantzazu Mendi
• Woo Anthony v Singapore Airlines Ltd (Civil Aeronautics Administration, Third Party)
• New York - Upright v Mercury Business Machines Company
• State Immunity Act
• Patents Act