Bobolas v Economist Newspaper Ltd
Enlazado como:
Extracto
Bobolas v Economist Newspaper Ltd
No longer available (Autolink)
Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Afectaciones
CONSIDERA CASO
REFIERE
APLICA
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
- Cropper v Smith
DISTINGUE
CONSIDERA
- Defamation Act 1952 - Artículos : S-5
- Public Authorities Protection Act 1893
REPORTED OPINION OF por
APLICADA por
- Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Ltd (No 2)
- Anthony Simmons and Sandra Simmons v Marino Sakhnor (Executrix for Estate of Bertram Watkis), Janice Watkis and Edith Desnoes (Executrix for Estate George Desnoes)
CONSIDERADA por
REFERIDA por
Documentos citados
- Associated Leisure Ltd (Phonographic Equipment Company Ltd) v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Fidelitas Shipping Company Ltd v V/O Exportchleb
- Egger v Chelmsford (Viscount)
- Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others (Original Appeal) and Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others v Courts and Others (Cross Appeal)
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company