Bobolas v Economist Newspaper Ltd
Linked as:
Extract
Bobolas v Economist Newspaper Ltd
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
APPLIES
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
- Cropper v Smith
DISTINGUISHES
CONSIDERS
- Defamation Act 1952 - Articles : S-5
- Public Authorities Protection Act 1893
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPLIED in
- Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Ltd (No 2)
- Anthony Simmons and Sandra Simmons v Marino Sakhnor (Executrix for Estate of Bertram Watkis), Janice Watkis and Edith Desnoes (Executrix for Estate George Desnoes)
CONSIDERED in
- Hickox v Leeward Resorts Ltd
- Mahadeo v Kardway Contractors Ltd et Al; Seepersad v Kardway Contracots Ltd et Al
- Bonnett v Boyce et Al
[See more]
REFERRED in
This document cites
- Associated Leisure Ltd (Phonographic Equipment Company Ltd) v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Fidelitas Shipping Company Ltd v V/O Exportchleb
- Egger v Chelmsford (Viscount)
- Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others (Original Appeal) and Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others v Courts and Others (Cross Appeal)
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
