Khan v Golechha International Ltd
Linked as:
Extract
Khan v Golechha International Ltd
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
- Ramsden v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
APPLIES
DISTINGUISHES
CONSIDERS
- Moneylenders Act 1927 - Articles : S-13
- Money-lenders Act 1900
- Income Tax Act 1952 - Articles : S-412
CITED in
- Lower v Comcare
- (1) Midland Expressway Ltd (t/a as M6 Toll) (2) Secretary of State for Transport v (1) Caillion Construction Ltd (2) Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd (3) Balfour Beatty Group Ltd (4) Amec Capital Projects Ltd (No.3)
- Robert Tchenguiz and Another (Claimants in HQ12X05106 and HQ13X00672) v Rawlinson and Hunter Trustees Sa and Others (Claimants in HQ12X05082 and HQ13X00414) The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Defendant to all claims)
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Charm Maritime Inc. v Kyriakou
- Staffordshire County Council v Barber
- Hong Leong Finance Berhad v Maxdouble Construction (M) Sdn Bhd
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Ikram Mahamat Saleh v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
- Lisa Storrie v Post Office Ltd
- South Somerset District Council v Tonstate (Yeovil Leisure) Ltd
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
- Kuala Lumpur Finance Bhd, The; Veetak Enterprise Sdn Bhd
- Dato' Teong Teck Leng v Dato' Teong Teck Kim
- Priyamas Export Corporation sdn Bhd v Bank Buruh (M) Bhd
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
- Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence
- Econ Piling Pte Ltd v Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Company Ltd
- Bradford and Bingley Building Society v Seddon Hancock and Others, Third Parties
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPLIED in
This document cites
- Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others (Original Appeal) and Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others v Courts and Others (Cross Appeal)
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
- Ramsden v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- Ord v Ord
- Hoystead v Commissioner of Taxation