Barder v Caluori

Core Citations

---

DISAPPROVES

• Maconochie v Maconochie

CONSIDERS

• Thwaite v Thwaite
• Minton v Minton

[See more]

• D'Este v D'Este

REFERS TO

• Hinde v Hinde
• Passmore v Gill and Gill
• Thomson v Thomson

[See more]

• Stanhope v Stanhope
• Mosey v Mosey and Barker
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Curwen v James
• Rysak v Rysak and Bugajaski
• Murphy v Stone-Wallwork (Charlton) Ltd
• Automatic Woodturning Company Ltd v Stringer
• Warren v Warren
• Hyde v Hyde
• Kelly v Kelly and Brown
• Mulholland v Mitchell
• G. (formerly P.) v P. (Ancillary Relief: Appeal)
• Ling v Ling and Croker
• Dipple v Dipple

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Barder v Caluori

DOES NOT APPLY

• Minton v Minton
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)

REVERSES

• Barder v Caluori

CONSIDERS

• Purse v Purse
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-5

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1967 - Articles : S-6
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-190
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950 - Articles : S-26
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-7
• County Courts Act 1959 - Articles : S-108
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1987] UKHL J0520-1
• [1987] 2 All ER 440
• [1987] 2 FLR 480

[See more]

• (1987) 80 NR 81
• [1988] AC 20
• [1987] 2 WLR 1350

CONSIDERED in

• Blooman v Blooman
• Janet Linda Evans (Respondent (Petitioner) v Richard Jonathan Evans (Appellant
• NP and South Gloucestershire County Council and MLC (A Child) by his guardian

[See more]

• Muhammed Habeebuddin Ahmed v Kulsum Khan
• G (formerly S) v S (Ancillary Relief: Application to Set Aside Order)
• Nandu v Nandu
• Rasool v Khushi
• Jenkins v Jenkins
• Jeanette Elizabeth Suffolk v Robert Douglas Suffolk
• Robert David Edward Foster vCINDY Louise Foster
• Carol Ann Power (Petitioner/Applicant) v Keith Louis Power
• Horne v Horne
• Timothy Forder v Michelle Forder
• Den Heyer v Newby
• Roy Wood (Appellant (Plaintiff) v National Coal Corporation (Respondent
• Meredith v Meredith
• Carter v The Society of Lloyds
• Phillip John Morgan v Anne Felicity Taylor
• Gosain v Gosain
• Jeanette Elizabeth Suffolk v Robert Douglas Suffolk
• Hicks v Hicks
• Egbaiyelo v Egbaiyelo
• Ronald Sexton (Deceased) and Another v Elizabeth Marion Jane Levis (formerly Sexton)
• Ruth Lilian Hemedia (Respondent (Petitioner) v Omar Mohamed Abdel Aziz Hemeida (Appellant
• Susan Edwina Roberts v John Edward Roberts
• Read v Obe
• Anita Marie Reid (Respondent (Petitioner) v Ivan John Reid (Applicant
• Crozier v Crozier
• English Electrical Company Ltd v Alstom UK Plc
• Penny Mathison (Respondent (Petitioner) v David James Mathison (Appellant
• Swindale v Forder (Forder Intervening)
• S v S
• Grazyna Mekarska (Wife) (Applicant/Appellant) Martin Ruiz (Husband) and Another (Respondents)
• The Queen (on The Application of Satpal Ram) (Claimant) Secretary of State for The Home Department (Defendant) Parole Board (Interested party)
• Chuck Soji Lasekan v Jennifer Margaret Lasekan (Scott)
• Chaudhuri v Chaudhuri
• Tf v Pj (Reversal of Judgment)
• Heard v Heard
• Luppi v Revesz
• Williams v Thompson, Leatherdale and Francis
• RE S (A Child)
• Michael Thomas Petitioner v Margaret COCKSEDGE (FORMERLY THOMAS)
• Barber v Barber
• Cart v Cart
• KENNETH McDonald WOOD v JAYNE PATRICE ROST
• Maurice John Heard (Respondent\Appellant) v Heather Elizabeth Heard (Petitioner\Respondent)
• Jeanette Elizabeth Suffolk v Robert Douglas Suffolk
• Lindsay v Health Care Complaints Commission and Another
• Ian Robert (as the Trustee in Bankruptcy of Jonathan Chiam Elichaoff) v Sarah Jane Duncanson Woodall
• Kingdon v Kingdon
• O’C. v O’C
• Dixon v Marchant
• Shaw v Shaw
• Pearce v Pearce
• Christopher Linton Shann (Petitioner) v Veronica Catherine Shann
• Christopher Linton Shann (Applicant/Petitioner) v Veronica Catherine Shann
• Edmonds v Edmonds
• Thompson v Thompson
• B v B (Divorce: Financial Provision)
• A and B (Through their solicitor, James Alexander Netto) v F
• Rose v Rose (Divorce: Consent Orders) (No.2)
• Williams v Lindley
• Francis v Francis
• Gordon (Formerly Stefanou) v Stefanou
• The States Employment Board v Amar Alwitry
• P-S v C
• Jersey Financial Services Commission v Emma Mathew
• P-S v C and M
• L
• ELSIE BEATRICE Holmes v Kevin Ian WHEELER-JOHNS
• Norman v Norman
• Penrose v Penrose
• Westbury v Sampson
• Myerson v Myerson (No 2)
• Walkden v Walkden
• Judge v Judge
• Hamilton v Hamilton
• Richardson v Richardson and Another
• Brennan v Bolt Burdon (A Firm) and Others
• Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) and another
• Evans v SMG Television Ltd and Others
• Raja v Van Hoogstraten
• Community Care North East v Durham County Council
• Eastman v R
• Between: Dianne Patrice Fleiger Petitioner v Frank George Fleiger (Deceased) Respondent Michele Lenore Fleiger as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank George Fleiger (Deceased) Applicant
• Everoy Chin v Silver Star Motors Ltd
• Richard Stephen Wilson v Jason Smith and Joan Ferguson (Personal Representatives of Estate of Yvonne Elizabeth Cammaert Wilson)
• Gertude Lawrence v Joseph Lawrence
• Carol Lawrence v Andrea Fletcher-Dawkins
• Epstein v Epstein
• Carol Lawrence v Andrea Fletcher-Dawkins
• Smith v Smith (Smith and Others intervening)
• X v Y
• Robson v Robson
• Harb v King Fahd Bin Addul Aziz (Nos. 1 & 2)
• Woodley Douglas v Douglas
• Soogrim v Singh
• Db v Dlj
• EW v PW
• Harrigan v Harrigan
• Tatiana Akhmedova v Farkhad Teimur Ogly Akhmedov
• BETWEEN: Dianne Patrice Fleiger Petitioner v Frank George Fleiger (Deceased) Respondent Michele Lenore Fleiger as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank George Fleiger (Deceased) Applicant
• Leslie Dacosta Williams v Teleith Evelyn Williams
• Lightbourne v Lightbourne
• Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney South West Area Health Service

REFERRED in

• Elizabeth Jane Green v Charles John Adams
• AB v CD
• Zimina v Zimin

[See more]

• BT v CU
• Nafisa Hasan v Mahmud Ul-Hasan (Deceased)
• CB v EB
• Birch v Birch
• KG (Proposed Appellant) v LG (Proposed Respondent)
• Sheila Vanessa Harrigan [Pursuant to an Order of Court Pronounced by Mr. Justice Neville Smith on the 17th day of February 1995] in the interest of the Estate of Connell Lorenzo Harrigan, [Deceased] Appellant v Dolykin Rothene Harrigan Respondent [ECSC]

CITED in

• McG v McG
• Mickelberg v R
• Anthony Critchell v Charlotte Critchell

[See more]

• N v N
• Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney Local Health District
• Hui Chen v Hong Wei Lu as executor of the estate of the late Hong Jie Lu
• Aym v Ayl
• Range v Range
• Rose v Rose
• Starbibi Raja (Administratrix of the Estate of Mohammed Sabir Raja, Deceased) v Nicholas Van Hoogstraten
• Alicea Helen Birch v James William Hamilton Birch
• Anwer v Central Bridging Loans Ltd
• WA v The Executors of the estate of HA (Deceased) (First Respondents) JA (Second Respondent) KA (Third Respondent) LA (Fourth Respondents)
• B v IB
• X v Y
• Edna Vivien Smith v Norman Sidney Smith
• Gohil v Gohil
• Soulsbury v Soulsbury

FOLLOWED in

• Worlock v Worlock
• Teresa Kuan Chin v Chua Sze Chiang
• Foster v Foster

APPLIED in

• Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) and another

This document cites

---

• Sugden v Sugden
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• G. (formerly P.) v P. (Ancillary Relief: Appeal)
• Automatic Woodturning Company Ltd v Stringer
• Purse v Purse



See all quotations

• Murphy v Stone-Wallwork (Charlton) Ltd
• Minton v Minton
• Passmore v Gill and Gill
• Barder v Caluori
• Warren v Warren
• Thwaite v Thwaite
• Curwen v James
• Hinde v Hinde
• Minton v Minton
• Stanhope v Stanhope
• Mulholland v Mitchell
• Ling v Ling and Croker
• D'Este v D'Este
• Thomson v Thomson
• Rysak v Rysak and Bugajaski
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Hyde v Hyde
• Dipple v Dipple
• Maconochie v Maconochie
• Kelly v Kelly and Brown
• Mosey v Mosey and Barker
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1859
• County Courts Act 1959
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1967
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934