Nafisa Hasan v Mahmud Ul-Hasan (Deceased)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

[See more]

• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 - Articles : S-1
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-189
• County Courts Act 1959
• County Courts Act 1984 - Articles : S-77
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-50
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-27
• Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates' Courts Act 1978
• Equality Act 2010 - Articles : S-198
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25
• Administration of Justice Act 1969 - Articles : S-12
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970
• Administration of Justice Act 1982
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1857
• Insolvency Act 1986 - Articles : S-339
• Partnership Act 1890
• Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-23
• Administration of Justice Act 1969
• Administration of Justice Act 1969 - Articles : S-15

CONSIDERS

• Sugden v Sugden
• Mosey v Mosey and Barker
• Dipple v Dipple

[See more]

• D'Este v D'Este
• Barder v Caluori
• Maconochie v Maconochie
• Purse v Purse
• G. (formerly P.) v P. (Ancillary Relief: Appeal)
• Harb v King Fahd Bin Addul Aziz (Nos. 1 & 2)
• Northrop v Northrop
• Hyman v Hyman
• Butterworth v Butterworth; Collins v Collins; Barratt v Barratt; Howell v Howell; Adams v Adams; Ellworthy v Ellworthy
• Pritchard v Pritchard and Sims
• Ewer v Ewer and Charlton
• Doreen Ann Letang (Respondent) Frank Anthony Cooper (Appellant)
• Mercedes-Benz AG v Leiduck
• British Airways Board v Laker Airways Ltd
• Hill and another v Haines
• Hill and another v Haines
• White v White
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
• Richardson v Richardson and Another
• Smith v Smith (Smith and Others intervening)
• Reid v Reid
• WA v The Executors of the estate of HA (Deceased) (First Respondents) JA (Second Respondent) KA (Third Respondent) LA (Fourth Respondents)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2022] 1 FLR 1033
• [2021] 3 WLR 989
• [2022] FAM 1

CONSIDERED in

• Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) and another

AFFIRMED in

• Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) and another

This document cites

• Sugden v Sugden
• Barder v Caluori
• White v White
• WA v The Executors of the estate of HA (Deceased) (First Respondents) JA (Second Respondent) KA (Third Respondent) LA (Fourth Respondents)
• G. (formerly P.) v P. (Ancillary Relief: Appeal)



See all quotations

• Doreen Ann Letang (Respondent) Frank Anthony Cooper (Appellant)
• Northrop v Northrop
• Pritchard v Pritchard and Sims
• Richardson v Richardson and Another
• Purse v Purse
• British Airways Board v Laker Airways Ltd
• Hyman v Hyman
• Smith v Smith (Smith and Others intervening)
• Hill and another v Haines
• Harb v King Fahd Bin Addul Aziz (Nos. 1 & 2)
• Ewer v Ewer and Charlton
• Hill and another v Haines
• Mercedes-Benz AG v Leiduck
• Reid v Reid
• D'Este v D'Este
• Northrop v Northrop
• Dipple v Dipple
• Maconochie v Maconochie
• Butterworth v Butterworth; Collins v Collins; Barratt v Barratt; Howell v Howell; Adams v Adams; Ellworthy v Ellworthy
• Mosey v Mosey and Barker
• Insolvency Act 1986
• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
• Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates' Courts Act 1978
• County Courts Act 1959
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Partnership Act 1890
• County Courts Act 1984
• Administration of Justice Act 1982