Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) and another

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Administration of Justice Act 1969 - Articles : S-12
• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1878 - Articles : S-3
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1859
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-190
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-193
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950 - Articles : S-26
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-17
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-4
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-27
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-23
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-26
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934
• Fatal Accidents Act 1976
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970
• Race Relations Act 1976
• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
• Fatal Accidents Act 1976
• Race Relations Act 1976
• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1859
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1857 - Articles : S-V
• County Court Rules 1981
• Matrimonial Causes Rules 1977

CONSIDERS

• Nafisa Hasan v Mahmud Ul-Hasan (Deceased)
• Sugden v Sugden
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)

[See more]

• Hill and another v Haines
• Richardson v Richardson and Another
• D'Este v D'Este
• R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keiden) v Secretary of State for the International Development (in substitution for the Home Secretary and the Education Secretary)
• Barder v Caluori
• Maconochie v Maconochie
• Harb v King Fahd Bin Addul Aziz (Nos. 1 & 2)
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of CN) v Lewisham London Borough Council; ; R (on the application of ZH) v Newham London Borough Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, interested party)
• Thomson v Thomson
• Dipple v Dipple
• Hinde v Hinde
• Jacobs v London County Council
• London Jewellers Ltd v Attenborough ; London Jewellers Ltd v Robertsons (London) Ltd
• Folkes v King
• Cheater v Cater
• Erskine v Adeane
• Wyatt v Vince
• Smith v Smith (Smith and Others intervening)
• Reid v Reid
• WA v The Executors of the estate of HA (Deceased) (First Respondents) JA (Second Respondent) KA (Third Respondent) LA (Fourth Respondents)
• Doreen Ann Letang (Respondent) Frank Anthony Cooper (Appellant)
• Whyte v Ticehurst
• Re Bramwell (Deceased) Campbell v Tobin and Another
• Roberts v Fresco
• White v White
• Lewisham and Guys Mental Health NHS Trust v Andrews (Deceased)

REFERS TO

• Re Bramwell (Deceased) Campbell v Tobin and Another
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Lewisham and Guys Mental Health NHS Trust v Andrews (Deceased)

[See more]

• Smith v Smith (Smith and Others intervening)
• Reid v Reid
• Harb v King Fahd Bin Addul Aziz (Nos. 1 & 2)
• D'Este v D'Este
• Dipple v Dipple
• Hinde v Hinde
• London Jewellers Ltd v Attenborough ; London Jewellers Ltd v Robertsons (London) Ltd
• Jacobs v London County Council
• Cheater v Cater
• Erskine v Adeane
• Maconochie v Maconochie
• Thomson v Thomson
• Folkes v King
• Hill and another v Haines
• Richardson v Richardson and Another
• White v White
• Doreen Ann Letang (Respondent) Frank Anthony Cooper (Appellant)
• WA v The Executors of the estate of HA (Deceased) (First Respondents) JA (Second Respondent) KA (Third Respondent) LA (Fourth Respondents)
• Roberts v Fresco
• R (on the application of Steinfeld and Keiden) v Secretary of State for the International Development (in substitution for the Home Secretary and the Education Secretary)
• Wyatt v Vince
• R (on the application of CN) v Lewisham London Borough Council; ; R (on the application of ZH) v Newham London Borough Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, interested party)
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
• Whyte v Ticehurst
• R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APPLIES

• Sugden v Sugden
• Barder v Caluori

AFFIRMS

• Nafisa Hasan v Mahmud Ul-Hasan (Deceased)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2023] 3 WLR 189
• [12/07/2023] TLR 1
• [2024] AC 497

CONSIDERED in

• The Estate of Neil Douglas Archibald deceased v Alistair James Stewart

This document cites

• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934
• Administration of Justice Act 1969



See all quotations

• Nafisa Hasan v Mahmud Ul-Hasan (Deceased)