Dixon v Marchant

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• The Ampthill Peerage
• Reid v Reid
• Barder v Caluori

[See more]

• White v White
• Thwaite v Thwaite
• Taylor and Another v Lawrence and Another
• Preston v Preston
• Hewitson v Hewitson
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• S. v S. (Financial Provision: Post-Divorce Cohabitation)
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Smith v Smith
• Hope-Smith v Hope-Smith
• Pearce v Pearce
• Thompson v Thompson
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Smith v Smith (Smith and Others intervening)
• Middleton v Middleton
• Jagprit Randhawa and Others v The Queen
• Barber v Barber

APPLIES

• Barder v Caluori

CONSIDERS

• Duxbury v Duxbury
• Williams v Lindley
• Wells v Wells

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-23
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-31
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2008] All ER D 160 Jan
• 24/01/2008 Daily Cases
• [04/03/2008] TLR 1

[See more]

• [2008] 1 Fam CR 209

CITED in

• Judge v Judge
• Ah (Petitioner) v Ph

REFERRED in

• Cart v Cart
• O’C. v O’C
• Gohil v Gohil

CONSIDERED in

• Judge v Judge

This document cites

• Barder v Caluori
• Heard v Heard
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Duxbury v Duxbury
• Taylor and Another v Lawrence and Another



See all quotations

• White v White
• Jagprit Randhawa and Others v The Queen
• Preston v Preston
• Pearce v Pearce
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Middleton v Middleton
• Williams v Lindley
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Barder v Caluori
• B v B (Divorce: Financial Provision)
• Hewitson v Hewitson
• Hope-Smith v Hope-Smith
• Thwaite v Thwaite
• Smith v Smith (Smith and Others intervening)
• Barber v Barber
• Thompson v Thompson
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Smith v Smith
• Reid v Reid
• The Ampthill Peerage
• H. v H. (Family Provision: Remarriage)
• Wells v Wells
• S v S (Financial Provision: Cohabitation After Divorce)
• S. v S. (Financial Provision: Post-Divorce Cohabitation)
• Cornick v Cornick
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973