Dipple v Dipple

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 - Articles : S-1
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-190
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934

[See more]

• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925

CITES

• Cooke v Gill
• Read v Brown
• Mould v Mould

REFERRED in

• Flower & Hart v White Industries (Qld)Pty Ltd
• Kelly v Kelly and Brown
• Rysak v Rysak and Bugajaski

[See more]

• Wong Yuk Fong Lily v Menezes
• Whyte v Ticehurst
• Roberts v Fresco
• Purse v Purse
• Nafisa Hasan v Mahmud Ul-Hasan (Deceased)
• Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) and another
• Barder v Caluori

CITED in

• Hyde v Hyde
• Mayne v Jaques
• Johnston v Krakowski

DISTINGUISHED in

• Delahunty v Delahunty

APPLIED in

• Mosey v Mosey and Barker

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 58 TLR 141
• [1942] 1 All ER 234
• [1942] P 65

CONSIDERED in

• D'Este v D'Este
• Barder v Caluori
• Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) and another

[See more]

• Rodney v Loncke and Another
• Pelage v Bousquet
• Rodney v Loncke
• Lightbourne v Lightbourne
• Harb v King Fahd Bin Addul Aziz (Nos. 1 & 2)
• Giraudy Estates Ltd v Clairmont et Al

CLARIFIED in

• Sugden v Sugden