R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• B v Queen, The
• Campbell and Fell v United Kingdom
• The State (O) v O'Brien

[See more]

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Stafford
• Deaton v The Attorney General and the Revenue Commissioners
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey

CONSIDERS

• Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-2
• Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Criminal Justice Act 1967
• Criminal Justice Act 1991
• Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 - Articles : S-29
• Criminal Justice Act 1991 - Articles : S-35
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Prison Act 1952 - Articles : S-27

REFERS TO

• Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan); Re W
• Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood
• R (Lichniak) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

FOLLOWS

CITES

• Practice Statement: Life Sentences

CITED in

• Application by Mark Andrew Allen for the Setting of a Minimum Term Pursuant to Paragraph 3, Schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• R v Simon John Hall
• Application by Keith Rld Eames for The Setting of A Minimum Term Pursuant to Paragraph 3; Schedule of The Criminal Justice Act 2003

[See more]

• Setting of Minimum Terms in Relation to Robert Belnavis Pursuant to Paragraph 3, Schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Application by Lyndon Harper Coles for the review of a minimum term pursant to para. 3, schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Application by Darrin John Hobbs for the review of a minimum term pursant to para.3, schedule 22 of the the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Application by Gerald Docherty for the Setting of a Minimum Term Pursuant to Paragraph 3, Schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Application by TERENCE WILLIAM BURNS for the setting of a minimum term pursuant to Schedule
• Setting of a Minimum Term in Relation to Barry McIver Pursuant to Paragraph 3, Schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Setting of Minimum Terms in Relation to Gary George Gooden Pursuant to Paragraph 3, Schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• R v Jonathan Probyn
• R v Sivageetham Punniyamoorthy
• R v Hussain (Mahmood)
• Application by Adrian Burke for the review of a minimum term pursant to para. 3, schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• R v Mark Charles Taylor
• R v Abdul Haq
• Application by Jasvinder Singh for the Setting of a Minimum Term Pursuant to Paragraph 3, Schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Application by Colin Wardle for the setting of a minimum term pursant to para. 3, schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Application by Edward Colin Keith for the review of a minimum term pursant to para. 3, schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Wilkinson v Kitzinger and Another (Same-sex marriage)
• Carnegie (Keith), Daley (Renford), et Al
• Lynch v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform; Whelan v same

REFERRED in

• R (Middleton) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Nicholas Guy Tucker
• R v BR (Sentencing: Extended Licences

[See more]

• R (Spence) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (McFetrich) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Spence) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (King) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Cole, Rowland and Hawkes) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Noorkoiv) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• R (Wayne Thomas Black) v The Secretary of State for Justice
• R (Hindawi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Headley) v Same
• R (D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Richards) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Hammond) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Smith) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (ex parte X) v Y School
• R (on the applications of Hooper, Withey, Naylor and Martin) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• R (West) v Parole Board; R (Smith) v Parole Board (No 2) (Conjoined Appeals)
• Matthews v Ministry of Defence
• R (Roberts) v Parole Board
• R v Caines and Another
• R v Emma Last, Lee David Holbrook and Others
• Sieff v Fox

CONSIDERED in

• R (Wright) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Steven Gander
• David Harold Eastman v Australian Capital Territory

[See more]

• R v Michael Thomas Attwooll
• Application for Permission CALVEY
• R v Peter Foster
• R (IR) v (1) Dr G Shetty (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2)
• WB (a protected party through her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v W District Council
• R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• State of Mauritius v Khoyratty
• DPP v Wright
• R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Lendore et Al v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Sookram v Barrow (Commissioner of Prisons)
• Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Seepersad and Panchoo
• Scantlebury v R
• Commissioner of Police v Stuart
• Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago
• Sheldrake v DPP
• Integrity Commission v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago

APPLIED in

• R v Colin William Findlay
• R (Lichniak) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Mark Ian ROYDEN v The Metropolitan Borough of WIRRAL

FOLLOWED in

• R v X

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 27/02/2001 Times Law Reports
• [2001] HRLR 33
• [2001] ACD 84

[See more]

• [2001] PLR 70

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APPROVED in

• Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza

DISTINGUISHED in

• Peter Whelan v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
• Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan); Re W
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg



See all quotations

• R (Lichniak) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Stafford
• The State (O) v O'Brien
• B v Queen, The
• Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood
• Deaton v The Attorney General and the Revenue Commissioners
• Practice Statement: Life Sentences
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
• Criminal Justice Act 1991
• Criminal Justice Act 1967
• Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965
• Prison Act 1952
• Crime (Sentences) Act 1997
• Life Sentences (Northern Ireland) Order 2001
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Campbell and Fell v United Kingdom