Wachtel v Wachtel

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-2
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-4
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-5

REFERS TO

• Iverson v Iverson
• Jones v Jones
• Millward v Millward

[See more]

• Porter v Porter
• Wood v Wood
• Leslie v Leslie
• Trestain v Trestain
• Pettitt v Pettitt

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1973] 1 All ER 113
• [1973] 2 WLR 84
• [1973] Fam 72

CONSIDERED in

• Doreen Margarette Perry (Petitioner v Gerald William Rowland Perry
• Mary Isabella Hanlon (Plaintiff) v The Law Society
• Mary Eleancr Dikon (Petitioner) Thomas Henry Dixon (Respondent)

[See more]

• Eileen Barbara Hendrix v George James Hendrix
• Cooper K.I (Appellant Wife) v Cooper J.E (Respondent — Husband)
• Christothea Andrea Moisi (Appellant — Wife) v Christos Moisi (Respondent — Husband)
• BP (Petitioner) v KP NI (1st Intervener) OI (2nd Intervener)
• Josephine Elizabeth Hall (now Wootton) (Respondent (Petitioner) v Brian Hall (Appellant
• David Edward Storey v Ailsa Jane Storey
• Slater v Slater and Another
• Leslie William Orriss (Petitioner) Dorothy Mary Orriss (Respondent)
• Rogers v Rogers
• Annette Demuth Thomas (Respondent (Petitioner) v Ashley Robert Thomas (Appellant
• Blezard v Blezard and Mul
• F (M) v F (A)
• Scallon v Scallon
• K v K (Financial Provision: Conduct)
• Chamberlain v Chamberlain
• Rodewald v Rodewald
• Re Belfield Furnishings Ltd; Isaacs and another v Belfield Furnishings Ltd and Others
• Michael Firman (Plaintiff v Miss Diane Ellis (Defendant
• West v West
• A v B
• J v H
• Kennon v Spry
• Cooper-Hohn v Hohn
• A v R
• S v S
• Trippas v Trippas
• SC v LC
• George Washington Vaughan v Lois Adelle Hall
• R v R
• Juliet Bignall v Bashiru Issaka
• Lewis v Lewis
• Knowles v Knowles
• Oliver v Oliver
• Samuels v Samuels
• Daniels v Daniels
• Headley v Headley
• Maxine Barr-Meijerink v Ronald Meijerink
• Ottley v Ottley
• Valentine v Valentine
• Re Vidal, Norris
• C.K and G.K
• G.C. v D.C.
• Tk v Kk
• Crawford v Crawford
• Gaymes v Gaymes
• Rdl v Kol
• Vlf v Tf
• Sab v Chb
• Handler-ruiz v Haydon
• Atkinson v Atkinson
• Schenk v Schenk et Al
• Between: Albert Stanford Scott Petitioner v Indiana Matilda Watson-Scott Respondent
• DS v GE
• Durgha v Durgha
• Ache v Ache
• Sydney v Sydney
• Daniel v Guerra-daniel
• C v C
• Sealy v Scantlebury; Scantlebury v Sealy
• SM v AM
• Mdl v Rhrl
• Abraham v Abraham
• Ellison v Ellison
• Daubney v Daubney
• Maryse Jeannine Taylor Petitioner v Leon Oscar Taylor Respondent [ECSC]
• Betsy Rachael Narayan Ross v Joseph Fitz-Gerald Ross
• Hanlon v Hanlon
• H v H (Divorce: Financial Provision)
• O'D v O'D
• S v S (Non-Matrimonial Property: Conduct); S v S (Divorce: Distribution of Assets)
• Page v Page [1981]
• JC v AC
• Y v X
• Henry-belfon v Belfon
• R.C. v B.C
• XW v XH
• Edness v Edness
• Curtis v Curtis
• R v E and S
• Kohli v Kohli
• Abraham v Abraham
• Moze v Moze et Al
• Dart v Dart
• SC v LC
• Haye (nee Mccardy-massey) v Haye
• C.C v D.A.C
• J v J
• Sharp v Sharp
• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• Duxbury v Duxbury
• Hunt v Hunt
• Martin v Martin
• M (E) v M (W)
• Dixon v Marchant
• WP v VP
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
• SS v NS
• McCartney v Mills McCartney
• Cecile Joseph Petitioner v Antoine Joseph Respondent [ECSC]
• Bowleg v Bowleg

APPLIED in

• Cumbers v Cumbers
• Gengler v Gengler
• W. v W. (Financial Provision: Lump Sum)

[See more]

• Campbell v Campbell
• Backhouse v Backhouse
• Cuzner (formerly Underdown) v Underdown
• Robinson v Robinson
• Jones (M.A.) v Jones (W.)

REFERRED in

• Brickell v Brickell
• O'Neill v O'Neill
• Firman v Ellis

[See more]

• Danchevsky v Danchevsky
• Bassett v Bassett
• Browne (formerly Pritchard) v Pritchard
• Lombardi v Lombardi
• Lapidus v Davies
• Suttill v Graham
• Kowalczuk v Kowalczuk
• Tan Evelyn v Tan Lim Tai
• Eves v Eves
• Craig Laurie Barnard Petitioner/Respondent v Penelope Ann Barnard Nee Bird Respondent/Applicant [ECSC]
• Calderbank v Calderbank
• Hunter v Hunter

CITED in

• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• J.B.B. v S.M.B.

[See more]

• Wachtel v Wachtel

FOLLOWED in

• Hector v Hector

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Wachtel v Wachtel