Wachtel v Wachtel

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-2
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-4
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-5

REFERS TO

• Iverson v Iverson
• Jones v Jones
• Millward v Millward

[See more]

• Porter v Porter
• Wood v Wood
• Leslie v Leslie
• Trestain v Trestain
• Pettitt v Pettitt

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1973] 1 All ER 113
• [1973] 2 WLR 84
• [1973] Fam 72

CONSIDERED in

• Doreen Margarette Perry (Petitioner v Gerald William Rowland Perry
• Gaymes v Gaymes
• Re Vidal, Norris

[See more]

• Mary Isabella Hanlon (Plaintiff) v The Law Society
• Knowles v Knowles
• Mary Eleancr Dikon (Petitioner) Thomas Henry Dixon (Respondent)
• Valentine v Valentine
• Eileen Barbara Hendrix v George James Hendrix
• Juliet Bignall v Bashiru Issaka
• Cooper K.I (Appellant Wife) v Cooper J.E (Respondent — Husband)
• Maxine Barr-Meijerink v Ronald Meijerink
• Christothea Andrea Moisi (Appellant — Wife) v Christos Moisi (Respondent — Husband)
• Daubney v Daubney
• Curtis v Curtis
• BP (Petitioner) v KP NI (1st Intervener) OI (2nd Intervener)
• Tk v Kk
• Josephine Elizabeth Hall (now Wootton) (Respondent (Petitioner) v Brian Hall (Appellant
• David Edward Storey v Ailsa Jane Storey
• Slater v Slater and Another
• Handler-ruiz v Haydon
• Headley v Headley
• Leslie William Orriss (Petitioner) Dorothy Mary Orriss (Respondent)
• Samuels v Samuels
• Rogers v Rogers
• Annette Demuth Thomas (Respondent (Petitioner) v Ashley Robert Thomas (Appellant
• Blezard v Blezard and Mul
• Kohli v Kohli
• Cecile Joseph Petitioner v Antoine Joseph Respondent [ECSC]
• SC v LC
• SM v AM
• C.K and G.K
• Edness v Edness
• Ache v Ache
• Sydney v Sydney
• C v C
• Page v Page [1981]
• Durgha v Durgha
• Daniel v Guerra-daniel
• Oliver v Oliver
• Lewis v Lewis
• JC v AC
• Henry-belfon v Belfon
• Abraham v Abraham
• WP v VP
• Trippas v Trippas
• R v R
• Martin v Martin
• SC v LC
• Dixon v Marchant
• DS v GE
• M (E) v M (W)
• Hanlon v Hanlon
• SS v NS
• F (M) v F (A)
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
• S v S
• H v H (Divorce: Financial Provision)
• Scallon v Scallon
• Duxbury v Duxbury
• Ottley v Ottley
• Sealy v Scantlebury; Scantlebury v Sealy
• Abraham v Abraham
• Betsy Rachael Narayan Ross v Joseph Fitz-Gerald Ross
• Sab v Chb
• Vlf v Tf
• Schenk v Schenk et Al
• K v K (Financial Provision: Conduct)
• Chamberlain v Chamberlain
• Moze v Moze et Al
• Hunt v Hunt
• Maryse Jeannine Taylor Petitioner v Leon Oscar Taylor Respondent [ECSC]
• Between: Albert Stanford Scott Petitioner v Indiana Matilda Watson-Scott Respondent
• Kennon v Spry
• Ellison v Ellison
• Mdl v Rhrl
• C.C v D.A.C
• Daniels v Daniels
• Haye (nee Mccardy-massey) v Haye
• J v J
• R v E and S
• G.C. v D.C.
• Rdl v Kol
• R.C. v B.C
• S v S (Non-Matrimonial Property: Conduct); S v S (Divorce: Distribution of Assets)
• McCartney v Mills McCartney
• O'D v O'D
• Rodewald v Rodewald
• Re Belfield Furnishings Ltd; Isaacs and another v Belfield Furnishings Ltd and Others
• George Washington Vaughan v Lois Adelle Hall
• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• Dart v Dart
• Michael Firman (Plaintiff v Miss Diane Ellis (Defendant
• XW v XH
• Sharp v Sharp
• Atkinson v Atkinson
• Cooper-Hohn v Hohn
• West v West
• A v B
• J v H
• Crawford v Crawford
• Bowleg v Bowleg

APPLIED in

• Cumbers v Cumbers
• Gengler v Gengler
• W. v W. (Financial Provision: Lump Sum)

[See more]

• Campbell v Campbell
• Backhouse v Backhouse
• Jones (M.A.) v Jones (W.)
• Robinson v Robinson
• Cuzner (formerly Underdown) v Underdown

REFERRED in

• Brickell v Brickell
• O'Neill v O'Neill
• Kowalczuk v Kowalczuk

[See more]

• Tan Evelyn v Tan Lim Tai
• Hunter v Hunter
• Craig Laurie Barnard Petitioner/Respondent v Penelope Ann Barnard Nee Bird Respondent/Applicant [ECSC]
• Firman v Ellis
• Danchevsky v Danchevsky
• Bassett v Bassett
• Suttill v Graham
• Eves v Eves
• Browne (formerly Pritchard) v Pritchard
• Lombardi v Lombardi
• Lapidus v Davies
• Calderbank v Calderbank

CITED in

• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• Charman v Charman (No 2)
• J.B.B. v S.M.B.

[See more]

• Wachtel v Wachtel

FOLLOWED in

• Hector v Hector

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Wachtel v Wachtel