Bassett v Bassett

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Akingbehin v Akingbehin

REFERS TO

• Wachtel v Wachtel

CONSIDERS

• Hall v Hall
• Phillips v Phillips

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1974) 5 Fam Law 90
• (1974) 5 Fam Law 90
• [1975] 1 All ER 513

[See more]

• [1975] 2 WLR 270
• [1975] Fam 76

CONSIDERED in

• Walker v Walker
• Pamela Ann Wild (Appellant) Brian Wild (Respondent)
• Jane Walker (Petitioner) v Herbert Leslie Walker (Respondent)

[See more]

• Penelope Ann Marston (Petitioner/Appellant) v Bryan Henry Marston
• Minakshi Shirish Amin (Petitioner v Shirish Natubhai Amin (Respondent
• Maureen Brenda Kraszewski (Petitioner v Richard Christopher Kraszewski (Respondent
• Elizabeth Phyllis Jones (Appellant) Trevor Fraklyn Jones (Respondent)
• Delsie Cain v Ronald Cain
• Baptiste v Baptiste
• Pustam v Pustam
• Bourne v Bourne
• Weaver v Weaver et Al
• Griffith v Griffith
• Jaskaran v Jaskaran
• Jones v Jones
• Ottley v Ottley
• Griffith v Griffith
• Joseph v Joseph
• Moze v Moze et Al
• Davis v Johnson
• Arthur Owen (Respondent v Yukiko Owen (Appellant
• Le Mière (Née Rennell) v Le Mière

CITED in

• Vcm and Krm
• Reid, Carol Fay v Clinton Rexford Reid
• Wiseman v Simpson

REFERRED in

• Richards v Richards

APPLIED in

• Spindlow v Spindlow
• Pinson (Née Nichols) v Pinson

FOLLOWED in

• Samson v Samson

This document cites

• Hall v Hall
• Phillips v Phillips
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Akingbehin v Akingbehin