Porter v Porter

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Kershaw v Kershaw

REFERS TO

• Attwood v Attwood
• Trestain v Trestain
• Kershaw v Kershaw

[See more]

• Wood v Wood
• J v J

CONSIDERS

• Roberts v Roberts
• Iverson v Iverson
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-5

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-16

DISTINGUISHES

• Field v Field

APPLIED in

• Ackerman v Ackerman
• Tumath v Tumath

REFERRED in

• Warren v Warren and Russell
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Gordon v Gordon

[See more]

• Cooper-Hohn v Hohn
• Clement Caul v Sonia Caul nee Josephina
• T v T
• White v White

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1969] 3 All ER 640
• [1969] 1 WLR 1155

CONSIDERED in

• Newell v Sandford
• Ackerman v Ackerman
• Harris (nee Stewart) v Harris

[See more]

• (Diane Lori Tabony v (August Henry Tabony
• T v T
• Sheron Shirley Theresa Harris Nee Stewart Petitioner v Rudolph Lerry Harris Respondent

This document cites

• J v J
• Trestain v Trestain
• Roberts v Roberts
• Kershaw v Kershaw
• Kershaw v Kershaw



See all quotations

• Field v Field
• Iverson v Iverson
• Attwood v Attwood
• Wood v Wood
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965